Comparison of ICD-10R, DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 in an adult autism spectrum disorder diagnostic clinic

  • C. Ellie Wilson*
  • , Nicola Gillan
  • , Deborah Spain
  • , Dene Robertson
  • , Gedeon Roberts
  • , Clodagh M. Murphy
  • , Stefanos Maltezos
  • , Janneke Zinkstok
  • , Katie Johnston
  • , Christina Dardani
  • , Chris Ohlsen
  • , P. Quinton Deeley
  • , Michael Craig
  • , Maria A. Mendez
  • , Francesca Happé
  • , Declan G.M. Murphy
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) diagnosis is often used to access services. We investigated whether ASD diagnostic outcome varied when DSM-5 was used compared to ICD-10R and DSM-IV-TR in a clinical sample of 150 intellectually able adults. Of those diagnosed with an ASD using ICD-10R, 56 % met DSM-5 ASD criteria. A further 19 % met DSM-5 (draft) criteria for Social Communication Disorder. Of those diagnosed with Autistic Disorder/Asperger Syndrome on DSM-IV-TR, 78 % met DSM-5 ASD criteria. Sensitivity of DSM-5 was significantly increased by reducing the number of criteria required for a DSM-5 diagnosis, or by rating 'uncertain' criteria as 'present', without sacrificing specificity. Reduced rates of ASD diagnosis may mean some ASD individuals will be unable to access clinical services.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2515-2525
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Volume43
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Autism Spectrum Disorder
  • Diagnosis
  • DSM-5
  • Prevalence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of ICD-10R, DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 in an adult autism spectrum disorder diagnostic clinic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this