Zalunfiban at First Medical Contact for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

  • A W J Van't Hof
  • , C M Gibson
  • , S A O F Rikken
  • , J L Januzzi
  • , C B Granger
  • , A van Beurden
  • , S Rasoul
  • , L Ruiters
  • , J Vainer
  • , A Verburg
  • , F Arslan
  • , J W Jukema
  • , M Durieux
  • , J Polad
  • , R van Vliet
  • , B J L van den Branden
  • , M Magro
  • , W Remkes
  • , J Beelen
  • , R Hermanides
  • R Tolsma, M Gosselink, D Vinereanu, V Chioncel, T P van de Hoef, R Boomars, K E Arkenbout, G K van Houwelingen, G Hengstman, H van de Wetering, R Pisters, P Kala, B Merkely, P Ecollan, F Lapostolle, R P Giugliano, R C Welsh, M Levy, A Arias-Mendoza, N Baron, D Cociorva, J Wittes, E F Unger, B S Coller, J M Ten Berg, G Montalescot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Zalunfiban is a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (integrin αIIbβ3) inhibitor designed for subcutaneous administration on first medical contact with patients with suspected ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

METHODS: An international, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial randomly assigned patients with STEMI in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive a single subcutaneous injection of zalunfiban (0.11 mg/kg or 0.13 mg/kg) or placebo. The primary efficacy end point was a hierarchical proportional odds model ranking seven end points from worst to best: all-cause death, stroke, recurrent myocardial infarction, acute stent thrombosis, new-onset or rehospitalization for heart failure, larger infarct size, or no end point through 30 days. The primary safety end point was the occurrence of severe or life-threatening bleeding as per the global use of strategies to open occluded coronary arteries (GUSTO) criteria.

RESULTS: The trial randomly assigned 2467 patients (853 to zalunfiban 0.11 mg/kg, 818 to zalunfiban 0.13 mg/kg, and 796 to placebo). The primary efficacy end point was significantly improved by zalunfiban (adjusted odds ratio 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.65 to 0.98; P=0.028). GUSTO severe bleeding was similar between those who received zalunfiban versus placebo (1.2% vs. 0.8%; P=0.40), but GUSTO mild to moderate bleeding was increased (6.4% vs. 2.5%; P<0.001). Angiography showed faster coronary blood flow with zalunfiban versus placebo (corrected frame count of the infarct-related artery 109 [interquartile range 35 to 176] vs. 176 [interquartile range 40 to 176]; P=0.012).

CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STEMI, zalunfiban administered at first medical contact significantly improved preintervention infarct-related patency and reduced the likelihood of a worse 30-day multicomponent hierarchical clinical end point. Zalunfiban was not associated with increased severe or life-threatening bleeding but was associated with increased mild to moderate bleeding. (Funded by CeleCor Therapeutics; CELEBRATE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04825743).

Original languageEnglish
Article numberEVIDoa2500268
JournalNEJM evidence
Volume5
Issue number1
Early online date10 Nov 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Zalunfiban at First Medical Contact for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this