Young women's opinions on the use of a blood test to predict the possibility of premature ovarian failure: a qualitative study

Anouk Grootenhuis, A van den Hoogen, Frank J.M. Broekmans, Helen Torrance, Harmieke van Os-Medendorp, HDL Ockhuysen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

19 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) test is increasingly being used to predict the age when women will enter menopause, signalling the end of their reproductive life. However, the accuracy of the AMH test varies widely. In this qualitative study, we asked young women of three differing education levels about the possibility of predicting premature ovarian failure (POF), defined as menopause that occurs before the age of 40. A total of 15 face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted. The overarching theme was 'considering the possibility of predicting POF', and the three interpretive themes were (i) limited fertility knowledge, (ii) preconditions for pregnancy and (iii) desire to have children. The interview was their first awareness of the concept of POF. All the women who participated in this study wished to have children at some point later in life and tended to think more about fulfilling preconditions before getting pregnant than about their actual fertility. Most participants (n = 8) were interested in the AMH test regardless of their education level. Five participants wanted to take the test in the future. This research provides some insight into young women's current thoughts about the possibility of predicting POF with an AMH test.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)304-314
Number of pages11
JournalHuman fertility
Volume24
Issue number4
Early online date17 Sept 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2021

Keywords

  • Premature ovarian failure
  • qualitative

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Young women's opinions on the use of a blood test to predict the possibility of premature ovarian failure: a qualitative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this