TY - JOUR
T1 - Workplace Mental Health Disclosure, Sustainable Employability and Well-Being at Work
T2 - A Cross-Sectional Study Among Military Personnel with Mental Illness
AU - Bogaers, Rebecca
AU - Geuze, Elbert
AU - van Weeghel, Jaap
AU - Leijten, Fenna
AU - van de Mheen, Dike
AU - Rüsch, Nicolas
AU - Rozema, Andrea
AU - Brouwers, Evelien
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank the people who participated in this study and shared their personal experiences with us, giving us insight into this important topic. We are grateful to the providers of the funding for this research, the IMPACT PhD Program 2018 of Tilburg University and a grant from the Dutch Ministry of Defence. Finally, we thank the military department ‘Trends, Research and Statistics’, and especially Jolanda Snijders, who helped with participant recruitment.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - Purpose Disclosure of mental illness to a supervisor can have positive (e.g. supervisor support) and negative consequences (e.g. stigma). However, research on the association between disclosure and sustainable employability and well-being at work is scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the disclosure decision (yes/no), experiences with the decision (positive/negative) and sustainable employment and well-being at work among military personnel with mental illness (N = 323). Methods A cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted. Descriptive and regression (linear and ordinal) analyses were performed. Comparisons were made between those with positive and negative disclosure experiences. Results Disclosure decision (yes/no) was not significantly associated with any of the measures of sustainable employability and well-being at work. However, positive disclosure experiences were significantly associated with higher scores on almost all measures of sustainable employability and well-being at work. Those with negative disclosure experiences reported significantly more shame (M
pos = 2.42, M
neg = 2.78, p <.05) and discrimination (M
pos = 1.70, M
neg = 2.84, p <.001). Those with a positive disclosure experience, reported significantly more supervisor support (M
pos = 3.20, M
neg = 1.94, p <.001). Conclusion We did not find evidence that the disclosure decision itself is related to measures of sustainable employment and well-being at work. In contrast, how participants had experienced their (non-)disclosure decision was significantly related to almost all measures. This emphasizes the importance of the work environments reactions to disclosure and mental illness in the workplace. Future research and interventions should focus on increasing the likelihood of positive disclosure experiences through creating a more inclusive work environment, with more supervisor support and less stigma.
AB - Purpose Disclosure of mental illness to a supervisor can have positive (e.g. supervisor support) and negative consequences (e.g. stigma). However, research on the association between disclosure and sustainable employability and well-being at work is scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the disclosure decision (yes/no), experiences with the decision (positive/negative) and sustainable employment and well-being at work among military personnel with mental illness (N = 323). Methods A cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted. Descriptive and regression (linear and ordinal) analyses were performed. Comparisons were made between those with positive and negative disclosure experiences. Results Disclosure decision (yes/no) was not significantly associated with any of the measures of sustainable employability and well-being at work. However, positive disclosure experiences were significantly associated with higher scores on almost all measures of sustainable employability and well-being at work. Those with negative disclosure experiences reported significantly more shame (M
pos = 2.42, M
neg = 2.78, p <.05) and discrimination (M
pos = 1.70, M
neg = 2.84, p <.001). Those with a positive disclosure experience, reported significantly more supervisor support (M
pos = 3.20, M
neg = 1.94, p <.001). Conclusion We did not find evidence that the disclosure decision itself is related to measures of sustainable employment and well-being at work. In contrast, how participants had experienced their (non-)disclosure decision was significantly related to almost all measures. This emphasizes the importance of the work environments reactions to disclosure and mental illness in the workplace. Future research and interventions should focus on increasing the likelihood of positive disclosure experiences through creating a more inclusive work environment, with more supervisor support and less stigma.
KW - Disclosure
KW - Mental health
KW - Military
KW - Stigma
KW - Sustainable employability
KW - Well-being
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141955614&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10926-022-10083-2
DO - 10.1007/s10926-022-10083-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 36376748
SN - 1053-0487
VL - 33
SP - 399
EP - 413
JO - Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
JF - Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
IS - 2
ER -