TY - JOUR
T1 - Workflow for automatic renal perfusion quantification using ASL-MRI and machine learning
AU - Bones, Isabell K
AU - Bos, Clemens
AU - Moonen, Chrit
AU - Hendrikse, Jeroen
AU - van Stralen, Marijn
N1 - Funding Information:
Applied and Engineering Sciences with project number 14951, which is (partly) financed by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) This work is part of the research program Applied and Engineering Sciences with project number 14951, which is (partly) financed by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). We thank MeVis Medical Solutions AG (Bremen, Germany) for providing MeVisLab medical image processing and visualization environment, which was used for image analysis.
Funding Information:
This work is part of the research program Applied and Engineering Sciences with project number 14951, which is (partly) financed by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). We thank MeVis Medical Solutions AG (Bremen, Germany) for providing MeVisLab medical image processing and visualization environment, which was used for image analysis.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - Purpose: Clinical applicability of renal arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI is hampered because of time consuming and observer dependent post-processing, including manual segmentation of the cortex to obtain cortical renal blood flow (RBF). Machine learning has proven its value in medical image segmentation, including the kidneys. This study presents a fully automatic workflow for renal cortex perfusion quantification by including machine learning-based segmentation. Methods: Fully automatic workflow was achieved by construction of a cascade of 3 U-nets to replace manual segmentation in ASL quantification. All 1.5T ASL-MRI data, including M
0, T
1, and ASL label-control images, from 10 healthy volunteers was used for training (dataset 1). Trained cascade performance was validated on 4 additional volunteers (dataset 2). Manual segmentations were generated by 2 observers, yielding reference and second observer segmentations. To validate the intended use of the automatic segmentations, manual and automatic RBF values in mL/min/100 g were compared. Results: Good agreement was found between automatic and manual segmentations on dataset 1 (dice score = 0.78 ± 0.04), which was in line with inter-observer variability (dice score = 0.77 ± 0.02). Good agreement was confirmed on dataset 2 (dice score = 0.75 ± 0.03). Moreover, similar cortical RBF was obtained with automatic or manual segmentations, on average and at subject level; with 211 ± 31 mL/min/100 g and 208 ± 31 mL/min/100 g (P <.05), respectively, with narrow limits of agreement at −11 and 4.6 mL/min/100 g. RBF accuracy with automated segmentations was confirmed on dataset 2. Conclusion: Our proposed method automates ASL quantification without compromising RBF accuracy. With quick processing and without observer dependence, renal ASL-MRI is more attractive for clinical application as well as for longitudinal and multi-center studies.
AB - Purpose: Clinical applicability of renal arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI is hampered because of time consuming and observer dependent post-processing, including manual segmentation of the cortex to obtain cortical renal blood flow (RBF). Machine learning has proven its value in medical image segmentation, including the kidneys. This study presents a fully automatic workflow for renal cortex perfusion quantification by including machine learning-based segmentation. Methods: Fully automatic workflow was achieved by construction of a cascade of 3 U-nets to replace manual segmentation in ASL quantification. All 1.5T ASL-MRI data, including M
0, T
1, and ASL label-control images, from 10 healthy volunteers was used for training (dataset 1). Trained cascade performance was validated on 4 additional volunteers (dataset 2). Manual segmentations were generated by 2 observers, yielding reference and second observer segmentations. To validate the intended use of the automatic segmentations, manual and automatic RBF values in mL/min/100 g were compared. Results: Good agreement was found between automatic and manual segmentations on dataset 1 (dice score = 0.78 ± 0.04), which was in line with inter-observer variability (dice score = 0.77 ± 0.02). Good agreement was confirmed on dataset 2 (dice score = 0.75 ± 0.03). Moreover, similar cortical RBF was obtained with automatic or manual segmentations, on average and at subject level; with 211 ± 31 mL/min/100 g and 208 ± 31 mL/min/100 g (P <.05), respectively, with narrow limits of agreement at −11 and 4.6 mL/min/100 g. RBF accuracy with automated segmentations was confirmed on dataset 2. Conclusion: Our proposed method automates ASL quantification without compromising RBF accuracy. With quick processing and without observer dependence, renal ASL-MRI is more attractive for clinical application as well as for longitudinal and multi-center studies.
KW - automatic ASL quantification
KW - automatic segmentation
KW - machine learning
KW - RBF
KW - renal ASL MRI
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117451586&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/mrm.29016
DO - 10.1002/mrm.29016
M3 - Article
C2 - 34672029
SN - 0740-3194
VL - 87
SP - 800
EP - 809
JO - Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
JF - Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
IS - 2
ER -