Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Wireless non-invasive continuous respiratory monitoring with FMCW radar: a clinical validation study

  • K. van Loon*
  • , M. J M Breteler
  • , Leo van Wolfswinkel
  • , A. T. Rheineck Leyssius
  • , S. Kossen
  • , C. J. Kalkman
  • , B. van Zaane
  • , L. M. Peelen
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Altered respiratory rate is one of the first symptoms of medical conditions that require timely intervention, e.g., sepsis or opioid-induced respiratory depression. To facilitate continuous respiratory rate monitoring on general hospital wards a contactless, non-invasive, prototype monitor was developed using frequency modulated continuous wave radar. We aimed to study whether radar can reliably measure respiratory rate in postoperative patients. In a diagnostic cross-sectional study patients were monitored with the radar and the reference monitor (pneumotachograph during mechanical ventilation and capnography during spontaneous breathing). Eight patients were included; yielding 796 min of observation time during mechanical ventilation and 521 min during spontaneous breathing. After elimination of movement artifacts the bias and 95 % limits of agreement for mechanical ventilation and spontaneous breathing were −0.12 (−1.76 to 1.51) and −0.59 (−5.82 to 4.63) breaths per minute respectively. The radar was able to accurately measure respiratory rate in mechanically ventilated patients, but the accuracy decreased during spontaneous breathing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)797–805
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Volume30
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Monitoring
  • Radar
  • Remote
  • Respiratory rate

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Wireless non-invasive continuous respiratory monitoring with FMCW radar: a clinical validation study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this