Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Is a call made by a surrogate related to urgency allocation or higher odds of a life-threatening event (LTE)?
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
METHOD: Calls to the OHS-PC were classified into 'patient-initiated call' or 'surrogate call'. Odds ratios were calculated for the relationship between the type of call and (a) urgency allocation, (b) ACS, and (c) life-threatening event.
RESULTS: In total 2428 recordings were included for analysis. Around half of the recordings were surrogate calls, and these more often received a high urgency (80.0%) than patient-initiated calls (57.8%). Of all participants, 13.9% were diagnosed with a LTE; in women 10.3%, in men 18.3%. In the surrogate call group this was 18.8%, in the patient-initiated call group 8.9%.
CONCLUSIONS: Surrogate calls on behalf of a patient with symptoms suggestive of ACS receive more often a high urgency, and these patients have a risk twice as high of an LTE.
| Translated title of the contribution | Who's calling?: The effect on triage when someone calls on behalf of a patient with chest pain |
|---|---|
| Original language | Dutch |
| Article number | D8748 |
| Journal | Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde |
| Volume | 169 |
| Publication status | Published - 28 Oct 2025 |
Keywords
- Humans
- Cross-Sectional Studies
- Triage
- Female
- Chest Pain/diagnosis
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Aged
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Who's calling? The effect on triage when someone calls on behalf of a patient with chest pain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver