What to Do With "Moderate" Reliability and Validity Coefficients?

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Clinimetric studies may use criteria for test-retest reliability and convergent validity such that correlation coefficients as low as .40 are supportive of reliability and validity. It can be argued that moderate (.40-.60) correlations should not be interpreted in this way and that reliability coefficients <.70 should be considered as indicative of unreliability. Convergent validity coefficients in the .40 to .60 or .40 to .70 range should be considered as indications of validity problems, or as inconclusive at best. Studies on reliability and convergent should be designed in such a way that it is realistic to expect high reliability and validity coefficients. Multitrait multimethod approaches are preferred to study construct (convergent-divergent) validity.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1051-1052
    Number of pages2
    JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
    Volume97
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2016

    Keywords

    • Outcome assessment (health care)
    • Psychometrics
    • Rehabilitation
    • Validation studies as topic

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'What to Do With "Moderate" Reliability and Validity Coefficients?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this