Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

What Data Do We Need to Show the Cost and Clinical Effectiveness, Bearing in Mind Sustainability, of Urological Disposables in Different Patient Groups? Ici-rs 2025

  • George Bou Kheir*
  • , Angela Rantell
  • , Claire Hentzen
  • , Efstathios Papaefstathiou
  • , Mauro Van den Ende
  • , Ana Sofia Da Silva
  • , Michel Wyndaele
  • , Andries Van Huele
  • , Sanjay Sinha
  • , Paul Abrams
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    1 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    INTRODUCTION: Urological disposables, including catheters, stents, irrigation systems, and incontinence pads, are essential in functional urology but generate large volumes of nonbiodegradable waste. Intermittent self-catheterization is the gold standard for impaired bladder emptying, while disposable pads are a frequent first-line coping strategy for incontinence. Their widespread use presents a growing environmental challenge in healthcare.

    METHODS: At the 2025 International Consultation on Incontinence-Research Society meeting, a dedicated session examined sustainability in urological disposables. Three questions were addressed: (1) how to define and measure sustainability, (2) whether sustainable alternatives are clinically effective and safe compared to conventional products, and for which patient groups, and (3) whether disposables are cost-effective when environmental and health system costs are included.

    RESULTS: Sustainability assessment involves life cycle analysis, carbon and water footprint evaluation, material composition, and waste generation. Existing sustainability studies are limited, non-comparative, and methodologically inconsistent, often using variable definitions and incomplete life cycle boundaries. Reusable incontinence pads and catheters generally have a lower environmental impact than single-use designs. Clinical outcomes, including infection rates and safety, are largely comparable between reusable and single-use catheters, though user preference often favors single-use products for convenience. Economic evaluations rarely incorporate environmental impacts, but proposed methods include monetizing emissions, converting environmental effects into health outcomes, and applying multi-criteria decision-making to integrate sustainability alongside clinical and economic performance.

    CONCLUSION: Advancing sustainable continence care requires standardised metrics, integration of environmental costs into economic evaluations, and patient-centered product innovation, supported by collaboration between clinicians, policymakers, and industry.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)969-977
    Number of pages9
    JournalNeurourology and Urodynamics
    Volume45
    Issue number5
    Early online date11 Nov 2025
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2026

    Keywords

    • absorbent pads
    • carbon footprint
    • environmental impact
    • health care economics
    • intermittent urethral catheterization
    • life cycle assessment
    • medical waste
    • sustainable development

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'What Data Do We Need to Show the Cost and Clinical Effectiveness, Bearing in Mind Sustainability, of Urological Disposables in Different Patient Groups? Ici-rs 2025'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this