Western outcomes of circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Enrique Rodríguez de Santiago*, Laurelle van Tilburg, Pierre H. Deprez, Mathieu Pioche, Roos E. Pouw, Michael J. Bourke, Stefan Seewald, Bas L.A.M. Weusten, Jeremie Jacques, Sara Leblanc, Pedro Barreiro, Arnaud Lemmers, Adolfo Parra-Blanco, Ricardo Küttner-Magalhães, Diogo Libânio, Helmut Messmann, Eduardo Albéniz, Michal F. Kaminski, Noor Mohammed, Felipe Ramos-ZabalaAlberto Herreros-de-Tejada, Hugo Huchima Koecklin, Timothée Wallenhorst, João Santos-Antunes, João A. Cunha Neves, Arjun D. Koch, Myriam Ayari, Rodrigo Garces-Duran, Thierry Ponchon, Jérôme Rivory, Jacques J.G.H.M. Bergman, Eva P.D. Verheij, Sunil Gupta, Stefan Groth, Vincent Lepilliez, Ana Rita Franco, Sanaa Belkhir, Jonathan White, Alanna Ebigbo, Andreas Probst, Romain Legros, Nastazja Dagny Pilonis, Diego de Frutos, Raquel Muñoz González, Mario Dinis-Ribeiro

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background and Aims: Circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection (cESD) in the esophagus has been reported to be feasible in small Eastern case series. We assessed the outcomes of cESD in the treatment of early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in Western countries. Methods: We conducted an international study at 25 referral centers in Europe and Australia using prospective databases. We included all patients with ESCC treated with cESD before November 2022. Our main outcomes were curative resection according to European guidelines and adverse events. Results: A total of 171 cESDs were performed on 165 patients. En bloc and R0 resections rates were 98.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 95.0-99.4) and 69.6% (95% CI, 62.3-76.0), respectively. Curative resection was achieved in 49.1% (95% CI, 41.7-56.6) of the lesions. The most common reason for noncurative resection was deep submucosal invasion (21.6%). The risk of stricture requiring 6 or more dilations or additional techniques (incisional therapy/stent) was high (71%), despite the use of prophylactic measures in 93% of the procedures. The rates of intraprocedural perforation, delayed bleeding, and adverse cardiorespiratory events were 4.1%, 0.6%, and 4.7%, respectively. Two patients died (1.2%) of a cESD-related adverse event. Overall and disease-free survival rates at 2 years were 91% and 79%. Conclusions: In Western referral centers, cESD for ESCC is curative in approximately half of the lesions. It can be considered a feasible treatment in selected patients. Our results suggest the need to improve patient selection and to develop more effective therapies to prevent esophageal strictures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)511-524.e6
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume99
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2024

Cite this