Voorspellen van hart- en vaatziekten op grond van bloeddrukmetingen betrouwbaarder met systolische dan met diastolische bloeddruk

Translated title of the contribution: Prediction of cardiovascular disease on the basis of blood-pressure measurements more reliable with systolic than with diastolic measurement

M. J.C.A. Van Trijp, D. E. Grobbee, A. W. Hoes, M. L. Bots*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objective. To find an answer in the literature to the question of which blood pressure parameter (systolic, diastolic or pulse pressure) best predicts cardiovascular disease and whether the magnitude of the association of the parameter varies with age. Design. Structured literature review. Method. Pubmed was searched for prospective cohort studies concerning the predictive power of two or more blood-pressure components (in particular pulse pressure). Results. Seven relevant articles were found. Systolic blood pressure was found to be a powerful predictor for cardiovascular disease at every age, while pulse pressure was found to be the weakest predictor. The predictive power of diastolic pressure was intermediate, and decreased with age whereas that of pulse pressure increased with age. Conclusion. Systolic blood pressure was the best predictor for cardiovascular disease, whereas the role of diastolic pressure appeared to be limited.

Translated title of the contributionPrediction of cardiovascular disease on the basis of blood-pressure measurements more reliable with systolic than with diastolic measurement
Original languageDutch
Pages (from-to)1456-1459
Number of pages4
JournalNederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde
Volume147
Issue number30
Publication statusPublished - 26 Jul 2003

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prediction of cardiovascular disease on the basis of blood-pressure measurements more reliable with systolic than with diastolic measurement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this