Voor de kritische lezer: Vragen bij gerandomiseerd onderzoek

Translated title of the contribution: For the critical reader: Questions to ask about randomised trials

Rolf H H Groenwold*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The aim of this article is to provide guidance for the assessment of articles on randomised trials. This guide is intended for those who may want to apply the published results of randomised trials in everyday medical practice. • In order to be able to attribute the observed differences in health outcomes between treatment groups with due certainty to the treatment being evaluated, it is necessary that the groups are comparable at the start of the study, during the study, and at the end of the study, i.e. when measuring the outcomes. • In order to interpret the results of randomised trials and generalise these results to clinical practice, it is also necessary to consider the purpose of the study, the comparison that is made, the magnitude and direction of the observed effect, and to whom that effect applies.

Translated title of the contributionFor the critical reader: Questions to ask about randomised trials
Original languageDutch
Article numberA9018
Number of pages5
JournalNederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde
Volume159
Issue number20
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)v
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'For the critical reader: Questions to ask about randomised trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this