TY - JOUR
T1 - Volumetric CT-images improve testing of radiological image interpretation skills
AU - Ravesloot, C.J.
AU - van der Schaaf, Marieke F
AU - van Schaik, JPJ
AU - ten Cate, Olle Th J
AU - van der Gijp, Anouk
AU - Mol, Christian P
AU - Vincken, Koen L
N1 - Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Current radiology practice increasingly involves interpretation of volumetric data sets. In contrast, most radiology tests still contain only 2D images. We introduced a new testing tool that allows for stack viewing of volumetric images in our undergraduate radiology program. We hypothesized that tests with volumetric CT-images enhance test quality, in comparison with traditional completely 2D image-based tests, because they might better reflect required skills for clinical practice.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two groups of medical students (n=139; n=143), trained with 2D and volumetric CT-images, took a digital radiology test in two versions (A and B), each containing both 2D and volumetric CT-image questions. In a questionnaire, they were asked to comment on the representativeness for clinical practice, difficulty and user-friendliness of the test questions and testing program. Students' test scores and reliabilities, measured with Cronbach's alpha, of 2D and volumetric CT-image tests were compared.RESULTS: Estimated reliabilities (Cronbach's alphas) were higher for volumetric CT-image scores (version A: .51 and version B: .54), than for 2D CT-image scores (version A: .24 and version B: .37). Participants found volumetric CT-image tests more representative of clinical practice, and considered them to be less difficult than volumetric CT-image questions. However, in one version (A), volumetric CT-image scores (M 80.9, SD 14.8) were significantly lower than 2D CT-image scores (M 88.4, SD 10.4) (p<.001). The volumetric CT-image testing program was considered user-friendly.CONCLUSION: This study shows that volumetric image questions can be successfully integrated in students' radiology testing. Results suggests that the inclusion of volumetric CT-images might improve the quality of radiology tests by positively impacting perceived representativeness for clinical practice and increasing reliability of the test.
AB - RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Current radiology practice increasingly involves interpretation of volumetric data sets. In contrast, most radiology tests still contain only 2D images. We introduced a new testing tool that allows for stack viewing of volumetric images in our undergraduate radiology program. We hypothesized that tests with volumetric CT-images enhance test quality, in comparison with traditional completely 2D image-based tests, because they might better reflect required skills for clinical practice.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two groups of medical students (n=139; n=143), trained with 2D and volumetric CT-images, took a digital radiology test in two versions (A and B), each containing both 2D and volumetric CT-image questions. In a questionnaire, they were asked to comment on the representativeness for clinical practice, difficulty and user-friendliness of the test questions and testing program. Students' test scores and reliabilities, measured with Cronbach's alpha, of 2D and volumetric CT-image tests were compared.RESULTS: Estimated reliabilities (Cronbach's alphas) were higher for volumetric CT-image scores (version A: .51 and version B: .54), than for 2D CT-image scores (version A: .24 and version B: .37). Participants found volumetric CT-image tests more representative of clinical practice, and considered them to be less difficult than volumetric CT-image questions. However, in one version (A), volumetric CT-image scores (M 80.9, SD 14.8) were significantly lower than 2D CT-image scores (M 88.4, SD 10.4) (p<.001). The volumetric CT-image testing program was considered user-friendly.CONCLUSION: This study shows that volumetric image questions can be successfully integrated in students' radiology testing. Results suggests that the inclusion of volumetric CT-images might improve the quality of radiology tests by positively impacting perceived representativeness for clinical practice and increasing reliability of the test.
KW - Clinical Competence
KW - Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
KW - Education, Medical, Continuing
KW - Educational Measurement
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Netherlands
KW - Radiographic Image Enhancement
KW - Radiology
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Students, Medical
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926954044&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.12.015
DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.12.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 25681136
SN - 0720-048X
VL - 84
SP - 856
EP - 861
JO - European Journal of Radiology
JF - European Journal of Radiology
IS - 5
ER -