TY - JOUR
T1 - Visual working memory capacity in Korsakoff’s amnesia
AU - Oudman, Erik
AU - Schut, Martijn J.
AU - Ten Brink, Antonia F.
AU - Postma, Albert
AU - Van der Stigchel, Stefan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2020/4/20
Y1 - 2020/4/20
N2 - Introduction: Despite the interest in memory functioning in Korsakoff’s syndrome (KS), visual working memory capacity in KS is still poorly understood. Results from the last decades on working memory limitations in KS appear to be mixed, clearly calling for further investigations. Method: We investigated visual working memory storage capacity of patients diagnosed with KS using a change detection paradigm. Nine patients diagnosed with KS and thirty age- and education- matched healthy controls were presented twice with 2, 3, 4, or 6 bars with different orientations and had to detect whether the orientation of the target bar had changed. Results: As a group, KS patients performed significantly worse than controls on all set sizes, with an average capacity of 1.13 items, compared to 1.75 items in the control participants. In case study analysis, 4 out of 9 patients performed significantly worse than control participants, while 5 had relatively intact visual working memory capacity. In patients, deficits in visual working memory could not be explained by other cognitive deficits. Conclusion: Based on these results, we conclude that visual working memory deficits are a prominent characteristic in some, but not all KS patients. Training visual working memory capacity could possibly optimize other cognitive difficulties in this population.
AB - Introduction: Despite the interest in memory functioning in Korsakoff’s syndrome (KS), visual working memory capacity in KS is still poorly understood. Results from the last decades on working memory limitations in KS appear to be mixed, clearly calling for further investigations. Method: We investigated visual working memory storage capacity of patients diagnosed with KS using a change detection paradigm. Nine patients diagnosed with KS and thirty age- and education- matched healthy controls were presented twice with 2, 3, 4, or 6 bars with different orientations and had to detect whether the orientation of the target bar had changed. Results: As a group, KS patients performed significantly worse than controls on all set sizes, with an average capacity of 1.13 items, compared to 1.75 items in the control participants. In case study analysis, 4 out of 9 patients performed significantly worse than control participants, while 5 had relatively intact visual working memory capacity. In patients, deficits in visual working memory could not be explained by other cognitive deficits. Conclusion: Based on these results, we conclude that visual working memory deficits are a prominent characteristic in some, but not all KS patients. Training visual working memory capacity could possibly optimize other cognitive difficulties in this population.
KW - change detection
KW - Korsakoff syndrome
KW - visual working memory
KW - working memory
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85079239927
U2 - 10.1080/13803395.2020.1722800
DO - 10.1080/13803395.2020.1722800
M3 - Article
C2 - 32028852
AN - SCOPUS:85079239927
SN - 1380-3395
VL - 42
SP - 363
EP - 370
JO - Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
JF - Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
IS - 4
ER -