TY - JOUR
T1 - Vertical tumor-positive resection margins and the risk of residual neoplasia after endoscopic resection of Barrett's neoplasia
T2 - a nationwide cohort with pathology reassessment
AU - Van Tilburg, Laurelle
AU - Verheij, Eva
AU - Van De Ven, Steffi Elisabeth Maria
AU - Van Munster, Sanne
AU - Weusten, Bas
AU - Alvarez Herrero, Lorenza
AU - Nagengast, Wouter B.
AU - Schoon, Erik J.
AU - Alkhalaf, Alaa
AU - Bergman, Jacques
AU - Pouw, Roos E.
AU - Oudijk, Lindsey
AU - Meijer, Sybren L.
AU - Jansen, Marnix
AU - Doukas, Michael
AU - Koch, Arjun Dave
AU - Brosens, Lodewijk A.A.
AU - Curvers, Wouter L.
AU - Houben, Martin H.M.G.
AU - De Jonge, Pieter Jan F.
AU - Kats-Ugurlu, Gursah
AU - Van Der Laan, Jaap S.
AU - Van Lijnschoten, Ineke G.
AU - Moll, Freek C.P.
AU - Ooms, Ariadne H.A.G.
AU - Raicu, G. Mihaela
AU - Tang, Thjon J.
AU - Westerhof, Jessie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Georg Thieme Verlag. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background: To evaluate the proportion of patients with residual neoplasia after endoscopic resection (ER) for Barrett's neoplasia with confirmed tumor-positive vertical resection margin (R1v). Methods: Retrospective cohort study including all patients treated with ER for Barrett's neoplasia with histologically documented R1v since 2008 in the Dutch Barrett Expert Centers. R1v was defined as cancer cells touching the vertical resection margin and Rx as not assessable margins. Reassessment of R1v specimen was performed by experienced pathologists until consensus was reached regarding vertical margins. Results: 101/110 included patients had macroscopically complete resections (T1a n=17, T1b n=84), of which 99/101 (98%) ER specimens were reassessed. Reassessment confirmed R1v in 74 (75%) patients and found Rx in 16% and R0 in 9%. Presence of residual neoplasia could be assessed in 66/74 patients during endoscopic reassessment (n=52) and/or in the surgical resection specimen (n=14), of whom 33/66 (50%)had residual neoplasia. Residual neoplasia detected during endoscopy was always endoscopically visible and biopsies from a normal appearing ER-scar did not detect additional neoplasia. Twenty-five patients with no residual neoplasia during endoscopic reassessment underwent endoscopic follow-up for median 37 months(IQR 12-50), in which 4 developed a local recurrence(16.0%), all detected as visible abnormalities. Conclusions: Histological evaluation of ER margins appears challenging as 75% of documented R1v cases were confirmed during reassessment. After ER with R1v, 50% of the patients had no residual neoplasia. Endoscopic reassessment 8-12 weeks after ER seems accurately able to detect residual neoplasia and help to determine the most appropriate strategy for patients with R1v.
AB - Background: To evaluate the proportion of patients with residual neoplasia after endoscopic resection (ER) for Barrett's neoplasia with confirmed tumor-positive vertical resection margin (R1v). Methods: Retrospective cohort study including all patients treated with ER for Barrett's neoplasia with histologically documented R1v since 2008 in the Dutch Barrett Expert Centers. R1v was defined as cancer cells touching the vertical resection margin and Rx as not assessable margins. Reassessment of R1v specimen was performed by experienced pathologists until consensus was reached regarding vertical margins. Results: 101/110 included patients had macroscopically complete resections (T1a n=17, T1b n=84), of which 99/101 (98%) ER specimens were reassessed. Reassessment confirmed R1v in 74 (75%) patients and found Rx in 16% and R0 in 9%. Presence of residual neoplasia could be assessed in 66/74 patients during endoscopic reassessment (n=52) and/or in the surgical resection specimen (n=14), of whom 33/66 (50%)had residual neoplasia. Residual neoplasia detected during endoscopy was always endoscopically visible and biopsies from a normal appearing ER-scar did not detect additional neoplasia. Twenty-five patients with no residual neoplasia during endoscopic reassessment underwent endoscopic follow-up for median 37 months(IQR 12-50), in which 4 developed a local recurrence(16.0%), all detected as visible abnormalities. Conclusions: Histological evaluation of ER margins appears challenging as 75% of documented R1v cases were confirmed during reassessment. After ER with R1v, 50% of the patients had no residual neoplasia. Endoscopic reassessment 8-12 weeks after ER seems accurately able to detect residual neoplasia and help to determine the most appropriate strategy for patients with R1v.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85185933136&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1055/a-2272-9794
DO - 10.1055/a-2272-9794
M3 - Article
C2 - 38378018
AN - SCOPUS:85185933136
SN - 0013-726X
VL - 56
SP - 559
EP - 568
JO - Endoscopy
JF - Endoscopy
IS - 08
ER -