VARIATIE IN HET FERTILITEITSONDERZOEK IN NEDERLAND

Translated title of the contribution: Variation in fertility testing in the Netherlands

F. M. Helmerhorst*, S. G. Oei, K. W.M. Bloemenkamp, M. J.N.C. Keirse

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To determine how a standard infertility investigation is conducted and to determine the use of fertility tests used in such investigations in relation to WHO guidelines. Design. Questionnaire survey. Setting. Dutch medical schools. Method. A questionnaire survey among the heads of all 8 university and 20 non-university teaching departments of obstetrics and gynaecology or their fertility units was conducted. One non-university department failed to respond. Results. The examinations recommended by the WHO (general physical examination, andrological and gynaecological examination, semen analysis, ovulation detection, tubal patency testing) in general were carried out, but general physical examination of the male as a rule was only carried out if indicated. Popular routine examinations not recommended by the WHO were the postcoital test and hysterosalpingography. Regarding the postcoital test, there was variation in the time interval after coitus and the standards for spermatozoal motility. Conclusion. Standard fertility investigations are usually based on empiricism and tradition, including the testing recommended by the WHO.

Translated title of the contributionVariation in fertility testing in the Netherlands
Original languageDutch
Pages (from-to)2088-2091
Number of pages4
JournalNederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde
Volume139
Issue number41
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1995

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Variation in fertility testing in the Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this