Value of phenotyping methods as an initial screening of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in epidemiologic studies

D Bergmans, M. Bonten, F. van Tiel, C. Gaillard, N London, S. de Geest, P. de Leeuw, Ellen E Stobberingh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When studying the epidemiology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, determination of the similarity of isolates is crucial. In the present study the distinctive capacity of four phenotyping methods (antibiotic susceptibility patterns, serotyping, phage-typing and outer membrane protein [OMP] profile analysis) was determined and compared to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of enzyme restricted chromosomal DNA. In all, 91 isolates of P. aeruginosa were cultured from ten patients. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns were concordant for all isolates. Serotyping yielded five, phage-typing eight, OMP profile analysis nine and PFGE seven distinct types of P. aeruginosa. Compared to PFGE, the distinctive capacities were 89% (81/91) for serotyping, 87% (79/91) for phage-typing, and 90% (82/91) for OMP profile analysis. When serotyping results were different, PFGE types also were different (exclusiveness 100%). However, isolates with the same serotype may have various PFGE patterns. In contrast, isolates with similar PFGE patterns could have different phage-types or OMP types. For the study of isolates of P. aeruginosa, serotyping provides a good initial selection to reduce the number of isolates that need to be genotyped.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)350-354
Number of pages5
JournalInfection
Volume25
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins/analysis DNA, Bacterial/analysis Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field Humans Mass Screening Microbial Sensitivity Tests Phenotype Pseudomonas aeruginosa/chemistry/*classification/drug effects/genetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Value of phenotyping methods as an initial screening of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in epidemiologic studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this