Value of histopathologic analysis of skin excisions by GPs

Translated title of the contribution: Value of histopathologic analysis of skin excisions by GPs

P.A.J. Buis, R.M. Chorus, P.J. van Diest

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The clinical diagnoses of skin lesions in general practice may sometimes not be very accurate. The aim of this study was to compare clinical versus final histopathological diagnosis status (benign, pre-malignant/malignant) in 4595 consecutive submissions by GPs. The final diagnosis was pre-malignant or malignant in 215 cases (4.7%). From the 4436 lesions clinically diagnosed as benign, 134 (3.0%) were pre-malignant or malignant on final histological diagnosis. From the 159 lesions clinically diagnosed as pre-malignant or malignant, 78 (49.1%) were in fact benign, and 81 (50.9%) were indeed pre-malignant or malignant on final diagnosis. The sensitivity for a malignant diagnosis was 38%, and the specificity 98%. The proportion of pre-malignancies or malignancies was 0.9% below and 9.2% above the age of 40 years. In conclusion, histopathological investigation of skin excisions by GPs yields a high percentage of unexpected pre-malignancies and malignancies. The number of misdiagnoses was age dependent, with a proportion of 1% and 9% of pre-malignancies/malignancies in patients below and above the age of 40 years, respectively. This indicates that all skin excisions by GPs must undergo routine histopathological investigation to ensure that serious malignancies are not missed.
Translated title of the contributionValue of histopathologic analysis of skin excisions by GPs
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)458-460
Number of pages3
JournalBritish Journal of General Practice
Volume55
Issue number515
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Keywords

  • Econometric and Statistical Methods: General
  • Geneeskunde (GENK)
  • Geneeskunde(GENK)
  • Algemeen onderzoek
  • Internal medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Value of histopathologic analysis of skin excisions by GPs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this