Abstract
Background: The validation of dietary assessment instruments is critical in the evaluation of diet as a chronic disease risk factor.
Objective: The objective was to assess the validity of a self-administered food-frequency questionnaire by comparison with dietary recall, urinary nitrogen excretion, and total energy expenditure data.
Design: Over a 1-y period, data from twelve 24-h dietary recalls, a food-frequency questionnaire, and four 24-h urine samples were obtained from 134 study participants of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study in Potsdam, Germany. In a substudy of 28 participants, total energy expenditure from doubly labeled water measurements was assessed.
Results: Energy-adjusted, deattenuated correlation coefficients between the questionnaire and the recalls ranged from 0.54 for dietary fiber to 0.86 for alcohol. Cross-classification of quintiles of nutrient intakes from the questionnaire and recalls indicated severe misclassification to be
Conclusions: These data indicate an acceptable relative validity of the food-frequency questionnaire in this study population. Compared with measurements of total energy expenditure and protein excretion, however, only moderate agreement with both the food-frequency questionnaire and the 24-h dietary recalls was observed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 439-447 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | American Journal of Clinical Nutrition |
| Volume | 70 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 1999 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- validity
- biomarkers
- energy expenditure
- epidemiology
- dietary recalls
- food-frequency questionnaire
- doubly labeled water
- FFQ
- nutrition
- EPIC Study
- Germany
- humans
- MEASUREMENT ERROR
- OBESE SUBJECTS
- EXPENDITURE
- RECORDS
- ADULTS
- VALIDITY
- COLLECTIONS
- GUIDELINES
- POTSDAM
- HEALTH