TY - JOUR
T1 - Using social media to highlight inhaled occupational exposures as a cause of lung disease
AU - Fishwick, David
AU - De Matteis, Sara
AU - van Tongeren, Martie
AU - Thompson, Emma
AU - Heederik, Dick J.J.
AU - Weldam, Saskia
AU - Szmytke, Ewelina
AU - Denning, Jessica
AU - Curran, Andrew David
AU - Powell, Pippa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
PY - 2026/7
Y1 - 2026/7
N2 - Introduction: The risks to lung health from workplace hazards remain incompletely understood and may still be overlooked by workers, employers and healthcare professionals. We used an online tool to collect European population-based data relating to workplace exposures, training and lung health. Methods: A targeted industry-specific digital tool, enquiring about the link between respiratory symptoms and work, was made accessible online over a 24-month period. Results: 22 393 individuals (mean age 43.6 years) responded; 55.7% were female, 46.7% completed in English, 19.9% in Portuguese, 17.8% in French, 10.5% in Dutch and 5% in German. 47% reported nasal symptoms, 42% cough, 21% chest tightness and 20% wheeze. 8412 (37.6%) reported at least one work-related symptom. The use of workplace training (11%) and guidance (17%) to prevent respiratory ill health was uncommon. 980 (5.9%) had changed their job because it had affected their breathing. Increasing age (OR 1.02 per year age increase), completion language (English (OR 0.66), French (OR 0.39)), workplace (bakery (OR 1.64), mine (OR 1.91), sports centre (OR 3.03) and farm (OR 1.77)) and workplace training (OR 0.71) were significantly associated with this outcome. These workers also had more work-related symptoms (p<0.001) and complained of more wheeze (p<0.001) and nasal symptoms (p<0.001). 919 (5.6%) workers with a more likely diagnosis of occupational asthma were more female, had less workplace guidance and training and had co-workers with health complaints. Conclusion: This tool has reached real-world working populations and these findings identify the need for further awareness raising, education and social media interventions.
AB - Introduction: The risks to lung health from workplace hazards remain incompletely understood and may still be overlooked by workers, employers and healthcare professionals. We used an online tool to collect European population-based data relating to workplace exposures, training and lung health. Methods: A targeted industry-specific digital tool, enquiring about the link between respiratory symptoms and work, was made accessible online over a 24-month period. Results: 22 393 individuals (mean age 43.6 years) responded; 55.7% were female, 46.7% completed in English, 19.9% in Portuguese, 17.8% in French, 10.5% in Dutch and 5% in German. 47% reported nasal symptoms, 42% cough, 21% chest tightness and 20% wheeze. 8412 (37.6%) reported at least one work-related symptom. The use of workplace training (11%) and guidance (17%) to prevent respiratory ill health was uncommon. 980 (5.9%) had changed their job because it had affected their breathing. Increasing age (OR 1.02 per year age increase), completion language (English (OR 0.66), French (OR 0.39)), workplace (bakery (OR 1.64), mine (OR 1.91), sports centre (OR 3.03) and farm (OR 1.77)) and workplace training (OR 0.71) were significantly associated with this outcome. These workers also had more work-related symptoms (p<0.001) and complained of more wheeze (p<0.001) and nasal symptoms (p<0.001). 919 (5.6%) workers with a more likely diagnosis of occupational asthma were more female, had less workplace guidance and training and had co-workers with health complaints. Conclusion: This tool has reached real-world working populations and these findings identify the need for further awareness raising, education and social media interventions.
KW - Asthma
KW - Epidemiology
KW - Occupational Health
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105041368710
U2 - 10.1136/oemed-2025-110401
DO - 10.1136/oemed-2025-110401
M3 - Article
C2 - 42270322
AN - SCOPUS:105041368710
SN - 1351-0711
VL - 83
SP - 217
EP - 222
JO - Occupational and environmental medicine
JF - Occupational and environmental medicine
IS - 4
ER -