TY - JOUR
T1 - Using a Smartwatch to Record Precordial Electrocardiograms
T2 - A Validation Study
AU - van der Zande, Joske
AU - Strik, Marc
AU - Dubois, Rémi
AU - Ploux, Sylvain
AU - Alrub, Saer Abu
AU - Caillol, Théo
AU - Nasarre, Mathieu
AU - Donker, Dirk W.
AU - Oppersma, Eline
AU - Bordachar, Pierre
N1 - Funding Information:
This work received financial support from the French Government as part of the “Investments of the Future” program managed by the National Research Agency (ANR) [Grant number ANR-10-IAHU-04].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the authors.
PY - 2023/2/25
Y1 - 2023/2/25
N2 - Smartwatches that support the recording of a single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) are increasingly being used beyond the wrist, by placement on the ankle and on the chest. However, the reliability of frontal and precordial ECGs other than lead I is unknown. This clinical validation study assessed the reliability of an Apple Watch (AW) to obtain conventional frontal and precordial leads as compared to standard 12-lead ECGs in both subjects without known cardiac anomalies and patients with underlying heart disease. In 200 subjects (67% with ECG anomalies), a standard 12-lead ECG was performed, followed by AW recordings of the standard Einthoven leads (leads I, II, and III) and precordial leads V1, V3, and V6. Seven parameters (P, QRS, ST, and T-wave amplitudes, PR, QRS, and QT intervals) were compared through a Bland–Altman analysis, including the bias, absolute offset, and 95% limits of agreement. AW-ECGs recorded on the wrist but also beyond the wrist had similar durations and amplitudes compared to standard 12-lead ECGs. Significantly greater amplitudes were measured by the AW for R-waves in precordial leads V1, V3, and V6 (+0.094 mV, +0.149 mV, +0.129 mV, respectively, all p < 0.001), indicating a positive bias for the AW. AW can be used to record frontal, and precordial ECG leads, paving the way for broader clinical applications.
AB - Smartwatches that support the recording of a single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) are increasingly being used beyond the wrist, by placement on the ankle and on the chest. However, the reliability of frontal and precordial ECGs other than lead I is unknown. This clinical validation study assessed the reliability of an Apple Watch (AW) to obtain conventional frontal and precordial leads as compared to standard 12-lead ECGs in both subjects without known cardiac anomalies and patients with underlying heart disease. In 200 subjects (67% with ECG anomalies), a standard 12-lead ECG was performed, followed by AW recordings of the standard Einthoven leads (leads I, II, and III) and precordial leads V1, V3, and V6. Seven parameters (P, QRS, ST, and T-wave amplitudes, PR, QRS, and QT intervals) were compared through a Bland–Altman analysis, including the bias, absolute offset, and 95% limits of agreement. AW-ECGs recorded on the wrist but also beyond the wrist had similar durations and amplitudes compared to standard 12-lead ECGs. Significantly greater amplitudes were measured by the AW for R-waves in precordial leads V1, V3, and V6 (+0.094 mV, +0.149 mV, +0.129 mV, respectively, all p < 0.001), indicating a positive bias for the AW. AW can be used to record frontal, and precordial ECG leads, paving the way for broader clinical applications.
KW - ambulatory electrocardiography
KW - Apple Watch
KW - cardiac arrhythmias
KW - mobile health
KW - reliability
KW - wearables
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149888039&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/s23052555
DO - 10.3390/s23052555
M3 - Article
C2 - 36904759
SN - 1424-8220
VL - 23
JO - Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
JF - Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
IS - 5
M1 - 2555
ER -