TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of viral load to improve survey estimates of known HIV-positive status and antiretroviral treatment coverage
AU - Young, Peter W
AU - Zielinski-Gutierrez, Emily
AU - Wamicwe, Joyce
AU - Mukui, Irene
AU - Kim, Andrea A
AU - Waruru, Anthony
AU - Zeh, Clement
AU - Kretzschmar, Mirjam E
AU - De Cock, Kevin M
PY - 2020/3/15
Y1 - 2020/3/15
N2 - Objective:To compare alternative methods of adjusting self-reported knowledge of HIV-positive status and antiretroviral (ARV) therapy use based on undetectable viral load (UVL) and ARV detection in blood.Design:Post hoc analysis of nationally representative household survey to compare alternative biomarker-based adjustments to population HIV indicators.Methods:We reclassified HIV-positive participants aged 15-64 years in the 2012 Kenya AIDS Indicator Survey (KAIS) who were unaware of their HIV-positive status by self-report as aware and on antiretroviral treatment if either ARVs were detected or viral load was undetectable (<550copies/ml) on dried blood spots. We compared self-report to adjustments for ARV measurement, UVL, or both.Results:Treatment coverage among all HIV-positive respondents increased from 31.8% for self-report to 42.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 37.4-47.8] based on ARV detection alone, to 42.8% (95% CI 37.9-47.8) when ARV-adjusted, 46.2% (95% CI 41.3-51.1) when UVL-adjusted and 48.8% (95% CI 43.9-53.8) when adjusted for either ARV or UVL. Awareness of positive status increased from 46.9% for self-report to 56.2% (95% CI 50.7-61.6) when ARV-adjusted, 57.5% (95% CI 51.9-63.0) when UVL-adjusted, and 59.8% (95% CI 54.2-65.1) when adjusted for either ARV or UVL.Conclusion:Undetectable viral load, which is routinely measured in surveys, may be a useful adjunct or alternative to ARV detection for adjusting survey estimates of knowledge of HIV status and antiretroviral treatment coverage.
AB - Objective:To compare alternative methods of adjusting self-reported knowledge of HIV-positive status and antiretroviral (ARV) therapy use based on undetectable viral load (UVL) and ARV detection in blood.Design:Post hoc analysis of nationally representative household survey to compare alternative biomarker-based adjustments to population HIV indicators.Methods:We reclassified HIV-positive participants aged 15-64 years in the 2012 Kenya AIDS Indicator Survey (KAIS) who were unaware of their HIV-positive status by self-report as aware and on antiretroviral treatment if either ARVs were detected or viral load was undetectable (<550copies/ml) on dried blood spots. We compared self-report to adjustments for ARV measurement, UVL, or both.Results:Treatment coverage among all HIV-positive respondents increased from 31.8% for self-report to 42.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 37.4-47.8] based on ARV detection alone, to 42.8% (95% CI 37.9-47.8) when ARV-adjusted, 46.2% (95% CI 41.3-51.1) when UVL-adjusted and 48.8% (95% CI 43.9-53.8) when adjusted for either ARV or UVL. Awareness of positive status increased from 46.9% for self-report to 56.2% (95% CI 50.7-61.6) when ARV-adjusted, 57.5% (95% CI 51.9-63.0) when UVL-adjusted, and 59.8% (95% CI 54.2-65.1) when adjusted for either ARV or UVL.Conclusion:Undetectable viral load, which is routinely measured in surveys, may be a useful adjunct or alternative to ARV detection for adjusting survey estimates of knowledge of HIV status and antiretroviral treatment coverage.
KW - antiretroviral treatment
KW - biomarkers
KW - HIV surveillance
KW - Kenya
KW - population surveys
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081074633&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002453
DO - 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002453
M3 - Article
C2 - 31794520
SN - 0269-9370
VL - 34
SP - 631
EP - 636
JO - AIDS
JF - AIDS
IS - 4
ER -