TY - JOUR
T1 - Urban Governance, Multisectoral Action, and Civic Engagement for Population Health, Wellbeing, and Equity in Urban Settings
T2 - A Systematic Review
AU - Mesa-Vieira, Cristina
AU - Gonzalez-Jaramillo, Nathalia
AU - Díaz-Ríos, Catalina
AU - Pano, Octavio
AU - Meyer, Sophie
AU - Menassa, Marilyne
AU - Minder, Beatrice
AU - Lin, Vivian
AU - Franco, Oscar H.
AU - Frahsa, Annika
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 Mesa-Vieira, Gonzalez-Jaramillo, Díaz-Ríos, Pano, Meyer, Menassa, Minder, Lin, Franco and Frahsa.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Objectives: To identify the validated and reliable indicators and tools to assess good governance for population health, wellbeing, and equity in urban settings, and assess processes of multisectoral action and civic engagement as reported by peer-reviewed articles. Methods: We conducted a systematic review searching six databases for observational studies reporting strategies of either urban health, multisectoral action or civic engagement for wellbeing, health, or equity. Results: Out of 8,154 studies initially identified we included 17. From the included studies, 14 presented information about high-income countries. The general population was the main target in most studies. Multisectoral action was the most frequently reported strategy (14 studies). Three studies used Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool (Urban HEART). Health indicators were the most frequently represented (6 studies). Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of participatory health governance strategies were reported in 12 studies. Conclusion: Data on the implementation of participatory health governance strategies has been mainly reported in high-income countries. Updated and reliable data, measured repeatedly, is needed to closely monitor these processes and further develop indicators to assess their impact on population health, wellbeing, and equity.
AB - Objectives: To identify the validated and reliable indicators and tools to assess good governance for population health, wellbeing, and equity in urban settings, and assess processes of multisectoral action and civic engagement as reported by peer-reviewed articles. Methods: We conducted a systematic review searching six databases for observational studies reporting strategies of either urban health, multisectoral action or civic engagement for wellbeing, health, or equity. Results: Out of 8,154 studies initially identified we included 17. From the included studies, 14 presented information about high-income countries. The general population was the main target in most studies. Multisectoral action was the most frequently reported strategy (14 studies). Three studies used Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool (Urban HEART). Health indicators were the most frequently represented (6 studies). Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of participatory health governance strategies were reported in 12 studies. Conclusion: Data on the implementation of participatory health governance strategies has been mainly reported in high-income countries. Updated and reliable data, measured repeatedly, is needed to closely monitor these processes and further develop indicators to assess their impact on population health, wellbeing, and equity.
KW - civic engagement
KW - equity
KW - multisectoral action
KW - participatory health governance
KW - wellbeing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85170842262&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/ijph.2023.1605772
DO - 10.3389/ijph.2023.1605772
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37719658
AN - SCOPUS:85170842262
SN - 1661-8556
VL - 68
JO - International Journal of Public Health
JF - International Journal of Public Health
M1 - 1605772
ER -