TY - JOUR
T1 - Upper Airway Stimulation in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea
T2 - Long-Term Surgical Success, Respiratory Outcomes, and Patient Experience
AU - Veugen, Christianne C.A.F.M.
AU - Dieleman, Eveline
AU - Hardeman, Johannes A.
AU - Stokroos, Robert J.
AU - Copper, Marcel P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023. Fundação Otorrinolaringologia. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - Introduction Upper airway stimulation (UAS) with electric activation of the hypoglossal nerve has emerged as a promising treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea. Objective To retrospectively analyze objective and subjective outcome measures after long-term follow-up in obstructive sleep apnea patients receiving upper airway stimulation. Methods An observational retrospective single-center cohort study including a consecutive series of patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea receiving upper airway stimulation. Results Twenty-five patients were included. The total median apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) significantly decreased from 37.4 to 8.7 events per hour at the 12-month followup (p < 0.001). The surgical success rate was 96%. Adverse events were reported by 28% of the patients. Conclusion Upper airway stimulation is an effective and safe treatment for obstructive sleep apnea in patients with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) failure or intolerance. However, it is possible that the existing in and exclusion criteria for UAS therapy in the Netherlands have positively influenced our results.
AB - Introduction Upper airway stimulation (UAS) with electric activation of the hypoglossal nerve has emerged as a promising treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea. Objective To retrospectively analyze objective and subjective outcome measures after long-term follow-up in obstructive sleep apnea patients receiving upper airway stimulation. Methods An observational retrospective single-center cohort study including a consecutive series of patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea receiving upper airway stimulation. Results Twenty-five patients were included. The total median apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) significantly decreased from 37.4 to 8.7 events per hour at the 12-month followup (p < 0.001). The surgical success rate was 96%. Adverse events were reported by 28% of the patients. Conclusion Upper airway stimulation is an effective and safe treatment for obstructive sleep apnea in patients with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) failure or intolerance. However, it is possible that the existing in and exclusion criteria for UAS therapy in the Netherlands have positively influenced our results.
KW - electric stimulation therapy
KW - hypoglossal nerve
KW - implantable neurostimulators
KW - obstructive sleep apnea
KW - patient satisfaction
KW - treatment outcome
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85173643361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1055/s-0042-1743286
DO - 10.1055/s-0042-1743286
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85173643361
SN - 1809-9777
VL - 27
SP - 43
EP - 49
JO - INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
JF - INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
IS - 1
ER -