Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Updated Prostate Cancer Risk Groups by Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PPP2): Results from an International Multicentre Registry Study

  • Madeleine J Karpinski*
  • , Kambiz Rahbar
  • , Martin Bögemann
  • , Laya Rahbar Nikoukar
  • , Michael Schäfers
  • , Sebastian Hoberück
  • , Matthias Miederer
  • , Tobias Hölscher
  • , Sazan Rasul
  • , Marcin Miszczyk
  • , Francesco Lanfranchi
  • , Matteo Bauckneht
  • , Christian H Pfob
  • , Felix Kind
  • , Karolien Goffin
  • , Anika Hüsing
  • , Claudia Kesch
  • , Ken Herrmann
  • , Martin Stuschke
  • , Andrei Gafita
  • Johannes Hüsing, Jeremie Calais, Michael S Hofman, Thomas A Hope, Jonathan Miksch, Timo F W Soeterik, Andrea Di Giorgio, Andrea Farolfi, Anders Bjartell, Elin Trägårdh, Lena M Unterrainer, Adrien Holzgreve, Gabriel T Sheikh, Isabel Rauscher, Matthias Eiber, Boris A Hadaschik, Wolfgang P Fendler
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background and objective: We established prognostic nomograms incorporating prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) parameters standardised by Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PROMISE; PPP1). Here, we develop an updated PPP2 risk score from a large international multicentre registry study. Methods: We included 6128 prostate cancer patients who underwent PSMA-PET at 20 hospitals in Europe, USA, and Australia between 2013 and 2022. Investigator sites were split 2:1 into the development (4044 patients) and validation (2084 patients) cohorts. We created nomograms of version 2 (PPP2) based on Cox regression models with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator penalty for overall survival (development cohort). Performance of both nomograms was measured using Harrell's C-index and calibration plots and a head-to-head comparison with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk score by receiver operating characteristic curves (validation cohort). Key findings and limitations: Predictors were distant metastases (extrapelvic nodal metastases [M1a], bone metastases [M1b], and visceral metastases [M1c]), PSMA expression score, and total lesion count (visual PPP2) or total tumour volume (quantitative PPP2). C-indices (95% confidence interval) in the validation cohort were 0.80 (0.78–0.82; visual) and 0.80 (0.79–0.82; quantitative), respectively. Accuracy of both the PPP2 nomograms was superior to the NCCN risk score (n = 1034, area under the curve 0.84 vs 0.76; p < 0.001). The retrospective design represents a limitation of the study. Conclusions and clinical implications: PPP nomograms were improved in an international multicentre study to predict accurately the 3- and 5-yr overall survival probabilities of prostate cancer. PPP2 yielded superior accuracy to the NCCN risk score. A free software tool has been created for PROMISE and PPP2 assessments (promise-pet.org).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)484-495
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Urology
Volume88
Issue number5
Early online date2 May 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2025

Keywords

  • Overall survival
  • Prognosis
  • Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation nomogram
  • Prostate cancer
  • Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Updated Prostate Cancer Risk Groups by Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PPP2): Results from an International Multicentre Registry Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this