TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding Pediatric Patient Experiences with Urotherapy Tools
T2 - Qualitative Focus Group Study
AU - Bladt, Lola
AU - Nieuwhof-Leppink, Anka
AU - Blomme, Rose-Farah
AU - Vermeulen, Jiri
AU - Vermandel, Alexandra
AU - De Win, Gunter
AU - Van Campenhout, Lukas
N1 - © Lola Bladt, Anka Nieuwhof-Leppink, Rose-Farah Blomme, Jiri Vermeulen, Alexandra Vermandel, Gunter De Win, Lukas Van Campenhout. Originally published in JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting (https://pediatrics.jmir.org).
PY - 2025/10/16
Y1 - 2025/10/16
N2 - BACKGROUND: Standard urotherapy for childhood incontinence involves traditional tools like paper bladder diaries, timer watches, wetting alarms, and uroflowmeters. However, little is known about how these tools are experienced by today's digitally native children.OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore how children undergoing urotherapy perceive and experience these commonly used tools, with the goal of informing more engaging and child-centered design approaches.METHODS: A qualitative focus group design was used with purposive sampling of children undergoing in-clinic urotherapy group training. In total, 19 participants (13 boys and 6 girls) aged 9-13 years took part in focus groups of 3 to 4 children, held at the hospital. A child-friendly focus group toolkit was used to facilitate discussion through creative and playful exercises. A total of 7 focus groups were conducted, including 2 repeated sessions, until thematic saturation was reached. All sessions were held in Dutch, video- and audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. An inductive conventional content analysis was conducted using a dual-coder approach to identify and iteratively refine emerging themes.RESULTS: Four themes emerged: (1) attitudes and motivation: ranging from willingness to engage in urotherapy and use tools to reluctance or resistance; (2) social acceptance: highlighting the impact of peer perception, fear of being bullied, and opportunities to break the taboo and reframe tools as socially desirable; (3) contextual influences: including dissatisfaction with school toilets and limited child involvement at doctor visits, contrasted with the positive peer support experienced during group therapy; and (4) digital integration: children saw many traditional tools as outdated and suggested gamified, smart alternatives. The drawings created by children during the exercises served as a creative reflection of these thematic findings.CONCLUSIONS: Involving children in research and design is essential for creating interventions that are truly child-centered. Through creative, qualitative methods, this study uncovered rich insights into children's experiences with urotherapy tools, pointing to 4 key design priorities: personalization, stigma-free design, adaptability, and digital innovation.
AB - BACKGROUND: Standard urotherapy for childhood incontinence involves traditional tools like paper bladder diaries, timer watches, wetting alarms, and uroflowmeters. However, little is known about how these tools are experienced by today's digitally native children.OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore how children undergoing urotherapy perceive and experience these commonly used tools, with the goal of informing more engaging and child-centered design approaches.METHODS: A qualitative focus group design was used with purposive sampling of children undergoing in-clinic urotherapy group training. In total, 19 participants (13 boys and 6 girls) aged 9-13 years took part in focus groups of 3 to 4 children, held at the hospital. A child-friendly focus group toolkit was used to facilitate discussion through creative and playful exercises. A total of 7 focus groups were conducted, including 2 repeated sessions, until thematic saturation was reached. All sessions were held in Dutch, video- and audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. An inductive conventional content analysis was conducted using a dual-coder approach to identify and iteratively refine emerging themes.RESULTS: Four themes emerged: (1) attitudes and motivation: ranging from willingness to engage in urotherapy and use tools to reluctance or resistance; (2) social acceptance: highlighting the impact of peer perception, fear of being bullied, and opportunities to break the taboo and reframe tools as socially desirable; (3) contextual influences: including dissatisfaction with school toilets and limited child involvement at doctor visits, contrasted with the positive peer support experienced during group therapy; and (4) digital integration: children saw many traditional tools as outdated and suggested gamified, smart alternatives. The drawings created by children during the exercises served as a creative reflection of these thematic findings.CONCLUSIONS: Involving children in research and design is essential for creating interventions that are truly child-centered. Through creative, qualitative methods, this study uncovered rich insights into children's experiences with urotherapy tools, pointing to 4 key design priorities: personalization, stigma-free design, adaptability, and digital innovation.
U2 - 10.2196/79142
DO - 10.2196/79142
M3 - Article
C2 - 41100523
SN - 2561-6722
VL - 8
JO - JMIR pediatrics and parenting
JF - JMIR pediatrics and parenting
M1 - e79142
ER -