TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding barriers and facilitators to implementation of consensus-based recommendations for the management of very old people in intensive care
AU - Bourne, Richard S.
AU - Alberto, Laura
AU - Brummel, Nathan E.
AU - De Groot, Bas
AU - De Lange, Dylan W.
AU - Elbers, Paul
AU - Emmelot-Vonk, Marielle H.
AU - Flaatten, Hans
AU - Freund, Yonathan
AU - Galazzi, Alessandro
AU - Garcia-Martinez, Ana
AU - Guidet, Bertrand
AU - Holmerová, Iva
AU - Jacobs, Jeremy M.
AU - Joynt, Gavin M.
AU - Leaver, Susannah
AU - Leone, Marc
AU - McNicholas, Bairbre
AU - McWilliams, David
AU - Metaxa, Victoria
AU - Nickel, Christian H.
AU - Poole, Daniele
AU - Robba, Chiara
AU - Roedl, Kevin
AU - Romain, Marc
AU - Rousseau, Anne Françoise
AU - Sigal, Sviri
AU - Szczeklik, Wojciech
AU - Vallet, Hélène
AU - Van Oppen, James
AU - Jung, Christian
AU - Beil, Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/9/1
Y1 - 2025/9/1
N2 - Background: Recent consensus-based recommendations on the management of people aged ≥80 years in intensive care units (ICUs) were developed to guide the management of quality care. Objective: To understand perceived barriers and facilitators to consensus-based recommendations to support their implementation into multi-professional and disciplinary clinical practice. Methods: Analysis of comments made by an international multiprofessional group of intensive care, emergency and geriatric medicine specialists in the Delphi consensus on the management of people aged ≥80 years in ICUs. Barrier and facilitators were analysed using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Results: Care statement comments were provided by 99 of the 124 (79.8%) participants completing the Delphi first round; primarily identifying barriers (239/258; 92.6%). Most participants identified limitations in the environmental context and resources within the healthcare system (152, 63.6%); predominantly limitations in resources/material resources, with staffing (60, 25.1%), and beds or facilities (30, 12.6%) concerns. Potentially modifiable domains focused on inadequate knowledge (25, 10.5%), beliefs about consequences (18, 7.5%), care goals (16, 6.7%) and social/professional role and identity (16, 6.7%). Facilitators focused on improving staff knowledge, particularly amongst geriatric medicine and intensive care medicine specialities, and environmental context and resources (both 8, 42.1%). Conclusions: The environmental context and resources domain was the most common barrier identified. Behaviour change opportunities are centred on the domains knowledge, beliefs about consequences, goals and social/professional role and identity. Linked behaviour change techniques can be identified and developed according to local healthcare context to support implementation of care recommendations.
AB - Background: Recent consensus-based recommendations on the management of people aged ≥80 years in intensive care units (ICUs) were developed to guide the management of quality care. Objective: To understand perceived barriers and facilitators to consensus-based recommendations to support their implementation into multi-professional and disciplinary clinical practice. Methods: Analysis of comments made by an international multiprofessional group of intensive care, emergency and geriatric medicine specialists in the Delphi consensus on the management of people aged ≥80 years in ICUs. Barrier and facilitators were analysed using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Results: Care statement comments were provided by 99 of the 124 (79.8%) participants completing the Delphi first round; primarily identifying barriers (239/258; 92.6%). Most participants identified limitations in the environmental context and resources within the healthcare system (152, 63.6%); predominantly limitations in resources/material resources, with staffing (60, 25.1%), and beds or facilities (30, 12.6%) concerns. Potentially modifiable domains focused on inadequate knowledge (25, 10.5%), beliefs about consequences (18, 7.5%), care goals (16, 6.7%) and social/professional role and identity (16, 6.7%). Facilitators focused on improving staff knowledge, particularly amongst geriatric medicine and intensive care medicine specialities, and environmental context and resources (both 8, 42.1%). Conclusions: The environmental context and resources domain was the most common barrier identified. Behaviour change opportunities are centred on the domains knowledge, beliefs about consequences, goals and social/professional role and identity. Linked behaviour change techniques can be identified and developed according to local healthcare context to support implementation of care recommendations.
KW - barriers and facilitators
KW - consensus
KW - intensive care
KW - older people
KW - recommendations
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105017185021
U2 - 10.1093/ageing/afaf272
DO - 10.1093/ageing/afaf272
M3 - Article
C2 - 41004134
AN - SCOPUS:105017185021
SN - 0002-0729
VL - 54
JO - Age and ageing
JF - Age and ageing
IS - 9
M1 - afaf272
ER -