TY - JOUR
T1 - Ultrasound renal denervation for hypertension resistant to a triple medication pill (RADIANCE-HTN TRIO)
T2 - a randomised, multicentre, single-blind, sham-controlled trial
AU - Azizi, Michel
AU - Sanghvi, Kintur
AU - Saxena, Manish
AU - Gosse, Philippe
AU - Reilly, John P
AU - Levy, Terry
AU - Rump, Lars C
AU - Persu, Alexandre
AU - Basile, Jan
AU - Bloch, Michael J
AU - Daemen, Joost
AU - Lobo, Melvin D
AU - Mahfoud, Felix
AU - Schmieder, Roland E
AU - Sharp, Andrew S P
AU - Weber, Michael A
AU - Sapoval, Marc
AU - Fong, Pete
AU - Pathak, Atul
AU - Lantelme, Pierre
AU - Hsi, David
AU - Bangalore, Sripal
AU - Witkowski, Adam
AU - Weil, Joachim
AU - Kably, Benjamin
AU - Barman, Neil C
AU - Reeve-Stoffer, Helen
AU - Coleman, Leslie
AU - McClure, Candace K
AU - Kirtane, Ajay J
AU - Voskuil, Michiel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/6/26
Y1 - 2021/6/26
N2 - BACKGROUND: Endovascular renal denervation reduces blood pressure in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension, but its efficacy in patients with true resistant hypertension has not been shown. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of endovascular ultrasound renal denervation in patients with hypertension resistant to three or more antihypertensive medications.METHODS: In a randomised, international, multicentre, single-blind, sham-controlled trial done at 28 tertiary centres in the USA and 25 in Europe, we included patients aged 18-75 years with office blood pressure of at least 140/90 mm Hg despite three or more antihypertensive medications including a diuretic. Eligible patients were switched to a once daily, fixed-dose, single-pill combination of a calcium channel blocker, an angiotensin receptor blocker, and a thiazide diuretic. After 4 weeks of standardised therapy, patients with daytime ambulatory blood pressure of at least 135/85 mm Hg were randomly assigned (1:1) by computer (stratified by centres) to ultrasound renal denervation or a sham procedure. Patients and outcome assessors were masked to randomisation. Addition of antihypertensive medications was allowed if specified blood pressure thresholds were exceeded. The primary endpoint was the change in daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure at 2 months in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was also assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02649426.FINDINGS: Between March 11, 2016, and March 13, 2020, 989 participants were enrolled and 136 were randomly assigned to renal denervation (n=69) or a sham procedure (n=67). Full adherence to the combination medications at 2 months among patients with urine samples was similar in both groups (42 [82%] of 51 in the renal denervation group vs 47 [82%] of 57 in the sham procedure group; p=0·99). Renal denervation reduced daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure more than the sham procedure (-8·0 mm Hg [IQR -16·4 to 0·0] vs -3·0 mm Hg [-10·3 to 1·8]; median between-group difference -4·5 mm Hg [95% CI -8·5 to -0·3]; adjusted p=0·022); the median between-group difference was -5·8 mm Hg (95% CI -9·7 to -1·6; adjusted p=0·0051) among patients with complete ambulatory blood pressure data. There were no differences in safety outcomes between the two groups.INTERPRETATION: Compared with a sham procedure, ultrasound renal denervation reduced blood pressure at 2 months in patients with hypertension resistant to a standardised triple combination pill. If the blood pressure lowering effect and safety of renal denervation are maintained in the long term, renal denervation might be an alternative to the addition of further antihypertensive medications in patients with resistant hypertension.FUNDING: ReCor Medical.
AB - BACKGROUND: Endovascular renal denervation reduces blood pressure in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension, but its efficacy in patients with true resistant hypertension has not been shown. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of endovascular ultrasound renal denervation in patients with hypertension resistant to three or more antihypertensive medications.METHODS: In a randomised, international, multicentre, single-blind, sham-controlled trial done at 28 tertiary centres in the USA and 25 in Europe, we included patients aged 18-75 years with office blood pressure of at least 140/90 mm Hg despite three or more antihypertensive medications including a diuretic. Eligible patients were switched to a once daily, fixed-dose, single-pill combination of a calcium channel blocker, an angiotensin receptor blocker, and a thiazide diuretic. After 4 weeks of standardised therapy, patients with daytime ambulatory blood pressure of at least 135/85 mm Hg were randomly assigned (1:1) by computer (stratified by centres) to ultrasound renal denervation or a sham procedure. Patients and outcome assessors were masked to randomisation. Addition of antihypertensive medications was allowed if specified blood pressure thresholds were exceeded. The primary endpoint was the change in daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure at 2 months in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was also assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02649426.FINDINGS: Between March 11, 2016, and March 13, 2020, 989 participants were enrolled and 136 were randomly assigned to renal denervation (n=69) or a sham procedure (n=67). Full adherence to the combination medications at 2 months among patients with urine samples was similar in both groups (42 [82%] of 51 in the renal denervation group vs 47 [82%] of 57 in the sham procedure group; p=0·99). Renal denervation reduced daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure more than the sham procedure (-8·0 mm Hg [IQR -16·4 to 0·0] vs -3·0 mm Hg [-10·3 to 1·8]; median between-group difference -4·5 mm Hg [95% CI -8·5 to -0·3]; adjusted p=0·022); the median between-group difference was -5·8 mm Hg (95% CI -9·7 to -1·6; adjusted p=0·0051) among patients with complete ambulatory blood pressure data. There were no differences in safety outcomes between the two groups.INTERPRETATION: Compared with a sham procedure, ultrasound renal denervation reduced blood pressure at 2 months in patients with hypertension resistant to a standardised triple combination pill. If the blood pressure lowering effect and safety of renal denervation are maintained in the long term, renal denervation might be an alternative to the addition of further antihypertensive medications in patients with resistant hypertension.FUNDING: ReCor Medical.
KW - Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use
KW - Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory
KW - Calcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use
KW - Denervation/methods
KW - Drug Resistance
KW - Endovascular Procedures/methods
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Hypertension/therapy
KW - Kidney/blood supply
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Renal Artery/innervation
KW - Single-Blind Method
KW - Sodium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors/therapeutic use
KW - Ultrasonic Surgical Procedures/methods
U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00788-1
DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00788-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 34010611
SN - 0140-6736
VL - 397
SP - 2476
EP - 2486
JO - Lancet (London, England)
JF - Lancet (London, England)
IS - 10293
ER -