Ulnar injuries in distal radius fractures

J. Henk Coert*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In the time of Hippocrates and Galen, distal radius fractures were thought to be dislocations of the wrist. In France, Pouteau was the first to differ from this view when he described in 1783 a variety of forearm fractures in the French literature, including distal radius fractures. Pouteau presented a muscular theory of fracture pattern etiology, but one that is useful in the understanding of the displacement of the bone fragments. His ideas were directed to the concept that in sprains and dislocations, ligamentous injuries should be considered in the differential diagnosis of forearm injury. As a result, distal radius fractures were initially termed Pouteau fractures in the French-speaking world [19].

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationArthroscopic Management of Ulnar Pain
PublisherSpringer
Pages285-294
Number of pages10
ISBN (Electronic)9783642305443
ISBN (Print)9783642305436
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ulnar injuries in distal radius fractures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this