Abstract
Objective: Currently, there is no up-to-date guideline for the treatment of buccal mucosal squamous cell carcinoma (BMSCC) in the Netherlands. A questionnaire was used to investigate the opinions of Dutch head and neck surgeons on BMSCC of the cheek treatment. Methods: A questionnaire was sent to all 91 head and neck surgeons in the Netherlands. Their opinions on surgical tumor-free margins, through-and-through defects, and indications for local adjuvant therapy were questioned. Results: The response rate was 51%. To prevent a through-and-through defect, 67% of the surgeons would accept a deep clinical (macroscopic) margin of ≤5 mm. The less adverse histological characteristics a tumor has, the less consensus there is amongst the surgeons for local adjuvant treatment in case of close margins. Conclusion: There is no consensus amongst Dutch head and neck surgeons about the optimal treatment for BMSCC of the cheek. There are different opinions on acceptable resection margins, indications for a through-and-through defect, and indications for adjuvant treatment. BMSCC of the cheek treatment should be more uniform and less surgeon dependent. Level of evidence: N/A.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 857-864 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2023 |
Keywords
- buccal mucosal squamous cell carcinoma
- head and neck surgeon
- questionnaire
- through-and-through defect
- ultrasound
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Treatment of buccal mucosal carcinomas: A survey amongst head and neck surgeons in the Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver