Research output per year
Research output per year
Kirsti M. Jakobs*, Karlijn J. van den Brule-Barnhoorn, Jan van Lieshout, Joost G.E. Janzing, Wiepke Cahn, Maria van den Muijsenbergh, Marion C.J. Biermans, Erik W.M.A. Bischoff
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
General practitioners (GPs) are often unaware of antipsychotic (AP)-induced cardiovascular risk (CVR) and therefore patients using atypical APs are not systematically monitored. We evaluated the feasibility of a complex intervention designed to review the use of APs and advise on CVR-lowering strategies in a transmural collaboration. A mixed methods prospective cohort study in three general practices in the Netherlands was conducted in 2021. The intervention comprised three steps: a digital information meeting, a multidisciplinary meeting, and a shared decision-making visit to the GP. We assessed patient recruitment and retention rates, advice given and adopted, and CVR with QRISK3 score and mental state with MHI-5 at baseline and three months post-intervention. GPs invited 57 of 146 eligible patients (39%), of whom 28 (19%) participated. The intervention was completed by 23 (82%) and follow-up by 18 participants (64%). At the multidisciplinary meeting, 22 (78%) patients were advised to change AP use. Other advice concerned medication (other than APs), lifestyle, monitoring, and psychotherapy. At 3-months post-intervention, 41% (28/68) of this advice was adopted. Our findings suggest that this complex intervention is feasible for evaluating health improvement in patients using AP in a trial.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 12367 |
Journal | Scientific Reports |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 29 May 2024 |
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic › peer-review