Transient monocular blindness: The controversial role of the ophthalmic artery: Response to Rutgers et al. in J Neurol (2003) 250:501-502 [1] (multiple letters)

A. Petzold; N. Islam; G. T. Plant; D. R. Rutgers; G. A.P. De Kort; T. H. Lo; L. J. Kappelle

Transient monocular blindness: The controversial role of the ophthalmic artery: Response to Rutgers et al. in J Neurol (2003) 250:501-502 [1] (multiple letters)

A. Petzold^*
, N. Islam
, G. T. Plant
, D. R. Rutgers
, G. A.P. De Kort
, T. H. Lo
, L. J. Kappelle

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › Academic › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	882-884
Number of pages	3
Journal	Journal of Neurology
Volume	251
Issue number	7
Publication status	Published - 1 Jul 2004

Cite this

@article{344fbb69ccfe46d4950f1b19c3a10327,

title = "Transient monocular blindness: The controversial role of the ophthalmic artery: Response to Rutgers et al. in J Neurol (2003) 250:501-502 [1] (multiple letters)",

author = "A. Petzold and N. Islam and Plant, \{G. T.\} and Rutgers, \{D. R.\} and \{De Kort\}, \{G. A.P.\} and Lo, \{T. H.\} and Kappelle, \{L. J.\}",

year = "2004",

month = jul,

day = "1",

language = "English",

volume = "251",

pages = "882--884",

journal = "Journal of Neurology",

issn = "0340-5354",

publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transient monocular blindness

T2 - The controversial role of the ophthalmic artery: Response to Rutgers et al. in J Neurol (2003) 250:501-502 [1] (multiple letters)

AU - Petzold, A.

AU - Islam, N.

AU - Plant, G. T.

AU - Rutgers, D. R.

AU - De Kort, G. A.P.

AU - Lo, T. H.

AU - Kappelle, L. J.

PY - 2004/7/1

Y1 - 2004/7/1

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/3442882573

M3 - Letter

C2 - 15258794

AN - SCOPUS:3442882573

SN - 0340-5354

VL - 251

SP - 882

EP - 884

JO - Journal of Neurology

JF - Journal of Neurology

IS - 7

ER -

Transient monocular blindness: The controversial role of the ophthalmic artery: Response to Rutgers et al. in J Neurol (2003) 250:501-502 [1] (multiple letters)

Other files and links

Cite this