TY - JOUR
T1 - Total tumor volume predicts overall survival and response to induction chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases
T2 - An ancillary study of the phase 3 CAIRO5 trial
AU - Michiel Zeeuw, J
AU - Kemna, Ruby
AU - Ali, Mahsoem
AU - van Eck, Sophie
AU - Wesdorp, Nina J
AU - Roor, Joran
AU - van Waesberghe, Jan Hein T M
AU - van den Bergh, Janneke E
AU - Nota, Irene M G C
AU - Moos, Shira I
AU - van Dieren, Susan
AU - van Amerongen, Martinus J
AU - Bond, Marinde J G
AU - Chapelle, Thiery
AU - van Dam, Ronald M
AU - Engelbrecht, Marc R W
AU - Gerhards, Michael F
AU - Grunhagen, Dirk J
AU - van Gulik, Thomas M
AU - Hermans, John J
AU - de Jong, Koert P
AU - Klaase, Joost M
AU - Kok, Niels F M
AU - Leclercq, Wouter K G
AU - Liem, Mike S L
AU - van Lienden, Krijn P
AU - Quintus Molenaar, I
AU - Patijn, Gijs A
AU - Rijken, Arjen M
AU - Ruers, Theo M
AU - Verhoef, Cornelis
AU - de Wilt, Johannes H W
AU - Buffart, Tineke E
AU - Swijnenburg, Rutger-Jan
AU - Punt, Cornelis J A
AU - Verpalen, Inez M
AU - Stoker, Jaap
AU - Huiskens, Joost
AU - Kazemier, Geert
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors
PY - 2025/10/1
Y1 - 2025/10/1
N2 - Introduction: This study aimed to assess whether total tumor volume (TTV) outperforms RECIST1.1 for treatment response assessment in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), and to investigate TTV as a predictive biomarker for the optimal systemic treatment regimen for individual patients with initially unresectable CRLM. Methods: Patients with initially unresectable liver-only CRLM from the phase 3 CAIRO5 trial (NCT02162563) were included. All patients received induction systemic treatment. Baseline TTV and changes in TTV and RECIST1.1 in response to systemic treatment were calculated using the CT scans before systemic treatment and at first follow-up, and were assessed for their prognostic and predictive value with multivariable Cox regression models. Results In total, 425 patients were included. In multivariable analyses, baseline TTV (adjusted HR [aHR] for 100 mL vs 10 mL, 2.44 [95 % CI, 1.25–4.76]; P = 0.006) and relative change in TTV were the strongest predictors for OS (aHR for 0 % change vs 50 % decrease, 2.57 [1.83–3.60]; P < 0.0001). In contrast, RECIST1.1 was not independently associated with OS (aHR for partial response vs progressive disease, 0.63 [95 % CI, 0.33–1.20]). Higher baseline TTV predicted a stronger treatment benefit of FOLFOX-/FOLFIRI-bevacizumab vs FOLFOX-/FOLFIRI-panitumumab on OS (Pinteraction=0.017). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that TTV (i) outperforms traditional risk factors for OS prognostication, and (ii) may be a more accurate and sensitive treatment response assessment method compared to the currently used RECIST1.1 system in patients with initially unresectable CRLM. Moreover, TTV assessment is a promising approach for individualized clinical decision-making between bevacizumab and panitumumab.
AB - Introduction: This study aimed to assess whether total tumor volume (TTV) outperforms RECIST1.1 for treatment response assessment in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), and to investigate TTV as a predictive biomarker for the optimal systemic treatment regimen for individual patients with initially unresectable CRLM. Methods: Patients with initially unresectable liver-only CRLM from the phase 3 CAIRO5 trial (NCT02162563) were included. All patients received induction systemic treatment. Baseline TTV and changes in TTV and RECIST1.1 in response to systemic treatment were calculated using the CT scans before systemic treatment and at first follow-up, and were assessed for their prognostic and predictive value with multivariable Cox regression models. Results In total, 425 patients were included. In multivariable analyses, baseline TTV (adjusted HR [aHR] for 100 mL vs 10 mL, 2.44 [95 % CI, 1.25–4.76]; P = 0.006) and relative change in TTV were the strongest predictors for OS (aHR for 0 % change vs 50 % decrease, 2.57 [1.83–3.60]; P < 0.0001). In contrast, RECIST1.1 was not independently associated with OS (aHR for partial response vs progressive disease, 0.63 [95 % CI, 0.33–1.20]). Higher baseline TTV predicted a stronger treatment benefit of FOLFOX-/FOLFIRI-bevacizumab vs FOLFOX-/FOLFIRI-panitumumab on OS (Pinteraction=0.017). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that TTV (i) outperforms traditional risk factors for OS prognostication, and (ii) may be a more accurate and sensitive treatment response assessment method compared to the currently used RECIST1.1 system in patients with initially unresectable CRLM. Moreover, TTV assessment is a promising approach for individualized clinical decision-making between bevacizumab and panitumumab.
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115738
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115738
M3 - Article
C2 - 40912057
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 228
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
M1 - 115738
ER -