Total tumor volume predicts overall survival and response to induction chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases: An ancillary study of the phase 3 CAIRO5 trial

  • J Michiel Zeeuw*
  • , Ruby Kemna*
  • , Mahsoem Ali
  • , Sophie van Eck
  • , Nina J Wesdorp
  • , Joran Roor
  • , Jan Hein T M van Waesberghe
  • , Janneke E van den Bergh
  • , Irene M G C Nota
  • , Shira I Moos
  • , Susan van Dieren
  • , Martinus J van Amerongen
  • , Marinde J G Bond
  • , Thiery Chapelle
  • , Ronald M van Dam
  • , Marc R W Engelbrecht
  • , Michael F Gerhards
  • , Dirk J Grunhagen
  • , Thomas M van Gulik
  • , John J Hermans
  • Koert P de Jong, Joost M Klaase, Niels F M Kok, Wouter K G Leclercq, Mike S L Liem, Krijn P van Lienden, I Quintus Molenaar, Gijs A Patijn, Arjen M Rijken, Theo M Ruers, Cornelis Verhoef, Johannes H W de Wilt, Tineke E Buffart, Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg, Cornelis J A Punt, Inez M Verpalen, Jaap Stoker, Joost Huiskens, Geert Kazemier,
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to assess whether total tumor volume (TTV) outperforms RECIST1.1 for treatment response assessment in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), and to investigate TTV as a predictive biomarker for the optimal systemic treatment regimen for individual patients with initially unresectable CRLM. Methods: Patients with initially unresectable liver-only CRLM from the phase 3 CAIRO5 trial (NCT02162563) were included. All patients received induction systemic treatment. Baseline TTV and changes in TTV and RECIST1.1 in response to systemic treatment were calculated using the CT scans before systemic treatment and at first follow-up, and were assessed for their prognostic and predictive value with multivariable Cox regression models. Results In total, 425 patients were included. In multivariable analyses, baseline TTV (adjusted HR [aHR] for 100 mL vs 10 mL, 2.44 [95 % CI, 1.25–4.76]; P = 0.006) and relative change in TTV were the strongest predictors for OS (aHR for 0 % change vs 50 % decrease, 2.57 [1.83–3.60]; P < 0.0001). In contrast, RECIST1.1 was not independently associated with OS (aHR for partial response vs progressive disease, 0.63 [95 % CI, 0.33–1.20]). Higher baseline TTV predicted a stronger treatment benefit of FOLFOX-/FOLFIRI-bevacizumab vs FOLFOX-/FOLFIRI-panitumumab on OS (Pinteraction=0.017). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that TTV (i) outperforms traditional risk factors for OS prognostication, and (ii) may be a more accurate and sensitive treatment response assessment method compared to the currently used RECIST1.1 system in patients with initially unresectable CRLM. Moreover, TTV assessment is a promising approach for individualized clinical decision-making between bevacizumab and panitumumab.

Original languageEnglish
Article number115738
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer
Volume228
Early online date21 Aug 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Total tumor volume predicts overall survival and response to induction chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases: An ancillary study of the phase 3 CAIRO5 trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this