Timing of glioblastoma surgery and patient outcomes: A multicenter cohort study

Domenique M.J. Müller, Merijn E. De Swart, Hilko Ardon, Frederik Barkhof, Lorenzo Bello, Mitchel S. Berger, Wim Bouwknegt, Wimar A. Van Den Brink, Marco Conti Nibali, Roelant S. Eijgelaar, Julia Furtner, Seunggu J. Han, Shawn Hervey-Jumper, Albert J.S. Idema, Barbara Kiesel, Alfred Kloet, Emmanuel Mandonnet, Pierre A.J.T. Robe, Marco Rossi, Tommaso SciortinoW. Peter Vandertop, Martin Visser, Michiel Wagemakers, Georg Widhalm, Marnix G. Witte, Philip C. De Witt Hamer*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review


Background. The impact of time-to-surgery on clinical outcome for patients with glioblastoma has not been determined. Any delay in treatment is perceived as detrimental, but guidelines do not specify acceptable timings. In this study, we relate the time to glioblastoma surgery with the extent of resection and residual tumor volume, performance change, and survival, and we explore the identification of patients for urgent surgery. Methods. Adults with first-time surgery in 2012-2013 treated by 12 neuro-oncological teams were included in this study. We defined time-to-surgery as the number of days between the diagnostic MR scan and surgery. The relation between time-to-surgery and patient and tumor characteristics was explored in time-to-event analysis and proportional hazard models. Outcome according to time-to-surgery was analyzed by volumetric measurements, changes in performance status, and survival analysis with patient and tumor characteristics as modifiers. Results. Included were 1033 patients of whom 729 had a resection and 304 a biopsy. The overall median timeto-surgery was 13 days. Surgery was within 3 days for 235 (23%) patients, and within a month for 889 (86%). The median volumetric doubling time was 22 days. Lower performance status (hazard ratio [HR] 0.942, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.893-0.994) and larger tumor volume (HR 1.012, 95% CI 1.010-1.014) were independently associated with a shorter time-to-surgery. Extent of resection, residual tumor volume, postoperative performance change, and overall survival were not associated with time-to-surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbervdab053
JournalNeuro-oncology advances
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2021


  • Glioblastoma
  • neurosurgical procedures
  • time-to-treatment
  • treatment outcome
  • waiting list


Dive into the research topics of 'Timing of glioblastoma surgery and patient outcomes: A multicenter cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this