THYROPET study: Is it biology or technology that is the issue? Reply:

Jakob W. Kist; Bart De Keizer; Otto S. Hoekstra; Wouter V. Vogel

doi:10.2967/jnumed.116.181685

THYROPET study: Is it biology or technology that is the issue? Reply:

Jakob W. Kist, Bart De Keizer, Otto S. Hoekstra, Wouter V. Vogel

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	354-355
Number of pages	2
Journal	Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Volume	58
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.181685
Publication status	Published - 1 Feb 2017

Access to Document

10.2967/jnumed.116.181685

Cite this

@article{e4643a96e1444fdb8284320bbd21901b,

title = "THYROPET study: Is it biology or technology that is the issue? Reply:",

author = "Kist, {Jakob W.} and {De Keizer}, Bart and Hoekstra, {Otto S.} and Vogel, {Wouter V.}",

year = "2017",

month = feb,

day = "1",

doi = "10.2967/jnumed.116.181685",

language = "English",

volume = "58",

pages = "354--355",

journal = "Journal of Nuclear Medicine",

issn = "0161-5505",

publisher = "Society of Nuclear Medicine Inc.",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - THYROPET study

T2 - Is it biology or technology that is the issue? Reply:

AU - Kist, Jakob W.

AU - De Keizer, Bart

AU - Hoekstra, Otto S.

AU - Vogel, Wouter V.

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011994183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2967/jnumed.116.181685

DO - 10.2967/jnumed.116.181685

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

C2 - 27660140

AN - SCOPUS:85011994183

SN - 0161-5505

VL - 58

SP - 354

EP - 355

JO - Journal of Nuclear Medicine

JF - Journal of Nuclear Medicine

IS - 2

ER -

THYROPET study: Is it biology or technology that is the issue? Reply:

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this