TY - JOUR
T1 - The vestibular implant
T2 - Hearing preservation during intralabyrinthine electrode insertion-A case report
AU - van de Berg, Raymond
AU - Lucieer, Florence
AU - Guinand, Nils
AU - van Tongeren, Joost
AU - George, Erwin
AU - Guyot, Jean Philippe
AU - Kingma, Herman
AU - van Hoof, Marc
AU - Temel, Yasin
AU - van Overbeeke, Jacobus
AU - Perez-Fornos, Angelica
AU - Stokroos, Robert
PY - 2017/4/10
Y1 - 2017/4/10
N2 - Objective: The vestibular implant seems feasible as a clinically useful device in the near future. However, hearing preservation during intralabyrinthine implantation remains a challenge. It should be preserved to be able to treat patients with bilateral vestibulopathy and (partially) intact hearing. This case study investigated the feasibility of hearing preservation during the acute phase after electrode insertion in the semicircular canals. Methods: A 40-year-old woman with normal hearing underwent a translabyrinthine approach for a vestibular schwannoma Koos Grade IV. Hearing was monitored using auditory brainstem response audiometry (ABR). ABR signals were recorded synchronously to video recordings of the surgery. Following the principles of soft surgery, a conventional dummy electrode was inserted in the lateral semicircular canal for several minutes and subsequently removed. The same procedure was then applied for the posterior canal. Finally, the labyrinthectomy was completed, and the schwannoma was removed. Results: Surgery was performed without complications. No leakage of endolymph and no significant reduction of ABR response were observed during insertion and after removal of the electrodes from the semicircular canals, indicting no damage to the peripheral auditory function. The ABR response significantly changed when the semicircular canals were completely opened during the labyrinthectomy. This was indicated by a change in the morphology and latency of peak V of the ABR signal. Conclusion: Electrode insertion in the semicircular canals is possible without acutely damaging the peripheral auditory function measured with ABR, as shown in this proof-of-principle clinical investigation.
AB - Objective: The vestibular implant seems feasible as a clinically useful device in the near future. However, hearing preservation during intralabyrinthine implantation remains a challenge. It should be preserved to be able to treat patients with bilateral vestibulopathy and (partially) intact hearing. This case study investigated the feasibility of hearing preservation during the acute phase after electrode insertion in the semicircular canals. Methods: A 40-year-old woman with normal hearing underwent a translabyrinthine approach for a vestibular schwannoma Koos Grade IV. Hearing was monitored using auditory brainstem response audiometry (ABR). ABR signals were recorded synchronously to video recordings of the surgery. Following the principles of soft surgery, a conventional dummy electrode was inserted in the lateral semicircular canal for several minutes and subsequently removed. The same procedure was then applied for the posterior canal. Finally, the labyrinthectomy was completed, and the schwannoma was removed. Results: Surgery was performed without complications. No leakage of endolymph and no significant reduction of ABR response were observed during insertion and after removal of the electrodes from the semicircular canals, indicting no damage to the peripheral auditory function. The ABR response significantly changed when the semicircular canals were completely opened during the labyrinthectomy. This was indicated by a change in the morphology and latency of peak V of the ABR signal. Conclusion: Electrode insertion in the semicircular canals is possible without acutely damaging the peripheral auditory function measured with ABR, as shown in this proof-of-principle clinical investigation.
KW - Bilateral vestibular areflexia
KW - Bilateral vestibulopathy
KW - Electrode design
KW - Hearing preservation
KW - Neural prosthesis
KW - Vestibular implant
KW - Vestibular prosthesis
KW - Vestibulo-ocular reflex
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018789085&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fneur.2017.00137
DO - 10.3389/fneur.2017.00137
M3 - Article
C2 - 28443060
AN - SCOPUS:85018789085
SN - 1664-2295
VL - 8
SP - 137
JO - Frontiers in Neurology
JF - Frontiers in Neurology
IS - APR
M1 - 137
ER -