The unique status of first-in-human studies: Strengthening the social value requirement

Michelle G J L Habets*, Johannes J M van Delden, Annelien L. Bredenoord

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

For clinical research to be ethical, risks need to be balanced by anticipated benefits. This is challenging for first-in-human (FIH) studies as participants are not expected to benefit directly, and risks are potentially high. We argue that this differentiates FIH studies from other clinical trials to the extent that they should be given unique status in international research ethics guidelines. As there is a general positive attitude regarding the benefits of science, it is important to establish a more systematic method to assess anticipated social value to safeguard participants not only from enrolling in risky, but also in futile trials. Here, we provide some of necessary steps needed to assess the anticipated social value of the intervention.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)471-475
Number of pages5
JournalDrug Discovery Today
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The unique status of first-in-human studies: Strengthening the social value requirement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this