TY - JOUR
T1 - The relevance of a digestibility evaluation in the allergenicity risk assessment of novel proteins. Opinion of a joint initiative of COST action ImpARAS and COST action INFOGEST
AU - Verhoeckx, Kitty
AU - Bøgh, Katrine Lindholm
AU - Dupont, Didier
AU - Egger, Lotti
AU - Gadermaier, Gabriele
AU - Larré, Colette
AU - Mackie, Alan
AU - Menard, Olivia
AU - Adel-Patient, Karine
AU - Picariello, Gianluca
AU - Portmann, Reto
AU - Smit, Joost
AU - Turner, Paul
AU - Untersmayr, Eva
AU - Epstein, Michelle M.
N1 - Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/7
Y1 - 2019/7
N2 - The current allergenicity assessment of novel proteins is based on the EFSA GMO guidance. Recently, EFSA launched a new guidance document on allergenicity assessment of GM plants (2017). This document describes, amongst other topics, the new scientific and regulatory developments on in vitro protein digestibility tests. The EFSA GMO Panel stated that for in vitro protein digestibility tests, additional investigations are needed before any additional recommendation in the form of guidance can be provided. To this end, an interim phase is considered necessary to evaluate the revisions to the in vitro gastrointestinal digestion test, proposed by EFSA. This prompted the establishment of a joint workshop through two COST Action networks: COST Action ImpARAS and COST Acton INFOGEST. In 2017, a workshop was organised to discuss the relevance of digestion in allergenicity risk assessment and how to potentially improve the current methods and readouts. The outcome of the workshop is that there is no rationale for a clear readout that is predictive for allergenicity and we suggest to omit the digestion test from the allergenicity assessment strategy for now, and put an effort into filling the knowledge gaps as summarized in this paper first.
AB - The current allergenicity assessment of novel proteins is based on the EFSA GMO guidance. Recently, EFSA launched a new guidance document on allergenicity assessment of GM plants (2017). This document describes, amongst other topics, the new scientific and regulatory developments on in vitro protein digestibility tests. The EFSA GMO Panel stated that for in vitro protein digestibility tests, additional investigations are needed before any additional recommendation in the form of guidance can be provided. To this end, an interim phase is considered necessary to evaluate the revisions to the in vitro gastrointestinal digestion test, proposed by EFSA. This prompted the establishment of a joint workshop through two COST Action networks: COST Action ImpARAS and COST Acton INFOGEST. In 2017, a workshop was organised to discuss the relevance of digestion in allergenicity risk assessment and how to potentially improve the current methods and readouts. The outcome of the workshop is that there is no rationale for a clear readout that is predictive for allergenicity and we suggest to omit the digestion test from the allergenicity assessment strategy for now, and put an effort into filling the knowledge gaps as summarized in this paper first.
KW - Allergenicity risk assessment
KW - Food allergy
KW - Food digestion
KW - In vitro protein digestibility tests
KW - Novel proteins
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065530030&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.fct.2019.04.052
DO - 10.1016/j.fct.2019.04.052
M3 - Article
C2 - 31063834
AN - SCOPUS:85065530030
SN - 0278-6915
VL - 129
SP - 405
EP - 423
JO - Food and Chemical Toxicology
JF - Food and Chemical Toxicology
ER -