The predictive value of cranial ultrasound and of somatosensory evoked potentials after nerve stimulation for adverse neurological outcome in preterm infants

V. Pierrat, P. Eken, L. S. De Vries*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Thirty-nine preterm infants were studied to compare the predictive value of somatosensory evoked responses (SEPs) following median-nerve and posterior tibial-nerve stimulation with the predictive value of cranial ultrasound. With regard to the SEP, a normal median-nerve response was by no means a guarantee of a normal outcome. A normal posterior tibial-nerve response, however, almost guaranteed a normal outcome, but the test was very time consuming and the number of false positive responses was high (sensitivity 95.6%, specificity 50%). The presence of parenchymal involvement, either due to a haemorrhage or cystic leukomalacia predicted cerebral palsy with a sensitivity of 95.6% and a specificity of 68.5%. The combination of an abnormal posterior tibial response and the presence of parenchymal brain lesions had the best predictive value with a sensitivity of 91.3% and a specificity of 81.2%. These results show that, although posterior tibial-nerve responses have a better predictive value than median-nerve responses, these values were lower than that of cranial ultrasound. The best prediction was obtained when a combination of posterior-tibial responses and cranial ultrasound was used.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)398-403
Number of pages6
JournalDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology
Volume39
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jul 1997

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The predictive value of cranial ultrasound and of somatosensory evoked potentials after nerve stimulation for adverse neurological outcome in preterm infants'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this