The predictive and prognostic role of radiologically defined sarcopenia in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and multi-level meta-analysis

  • Hugo C. van Heusden
  • , Maartje A. van Beers
  • , Anouk W.M.A. Schaeffers
  • , Emma Swartz
  • , Justin E. Swartz
  • , Remco de Bree*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Radiologically defined sarcopenia (RS), defined as a lack of skeletal muscle mass (SMM) measured on cross-sectional CT or MR imaging, is increasingly recognized as a significant prognostic determinant in head and neck cancer (HNC). A systematic literature search of Embase and Medline was performed to identify studies investigating the impact of pre-treatment sarcopenia on the prognosis of HNC patients. All available survival and other treatment-related outcomes were extracted and analyzed in a multi-level meta-analysis. Sixty-three studies comprising data from 14,804 patients were analyzed. The overall estimated log OR was 0.644 (95% CI = 0.505–0.783, p < 0.001), suggesting that patients with RS have a higher risk of worse outcomes. In 43 studies there was a significant effect of sarcopenia on survival, with a log OR of 0.808 (95% CI = 0.509–1.107, p < 0.001). In 15 studies RS was shown to be a risk factor for treatment-related complications (log OR = 0.669, 95% CI = 0.441–0.897, p < 0.001). We conclude that pre-treatment radiologically defined sarcopenia is a robust prognostic and predictive factor in HNC patients and is associated with worse survival and increased risk of treatment-related complications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)131-143
Number of pages13
JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
Volume133
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Aug 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The predictive and prognostic role of radiologically defined sarcopenia in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and multi-level meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this