TY - JOUR
T1 - The Philosophy of Evidence-Based Principles and Practice in Nutrition
AU - Johnston, Bradley C
AU - Seivenpiper, John L
AU - Vernooij, Robin W M
AU - de Souza, Russell J
AU - Jenkins, David J A
AU - Zeraatkar, Dena
AU - Bier, Dennis M
AU - Guyatt, Gordon H
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
PY - 2019/6
Y1 - 2019/6
N2 - The practice of evidence-based nutrition involves using the best available nutrition evidence, together with clinical experience, to conscientiously work with patients' values and preferences to help them prevent (sometimes), resolve (sometimes), or cope with (often) problems related to their physical, mental, and social health. This article outlines the 3 fundamental principles of evidence-based practice as applied to the field of clinical nutrition. First, optimal clinical decision making requires awareness of the best available evidence, which ideally will come from unbiased systematic summaries of that evidence. Second, evidence-based nutrition provides guidance on how to decide which evidence is more or less trustworthy-that is, how certain can we be of our patients' prognosis, diagnosis, or of our therapeutic options? Third, evidence alone is never sufficient to make a clinical decision. Decision makers must always trade off the benefits with the risks, burden, and costs associated with alternative management strategies, and, in so doing, consider their patients' unique predicament, including their values and preferences.
AB - The practice of evidence-based nutrition involves using the best available nutrition evidence, together with clinical experience, to conscientiously work with patients' values and preferences to help them prevent (sometimes), resolve (sometimes), or cope with (often) problems related to their physical, mental, and social health. This article outlines the 3 fundamental principles of evidence-based practice as applied to the field of clinical nutrition. First, optimal clinical decision making requires awareness of the best available evidence, which ideally will come from unbiased systematic summaries of that evidence. Second, evidence-based nutrition provides guidance on how to decide which evidence is more or less trustworthy-that is, how certain can we be of our patients' prognosis, diagnosis, or of our therapeutic options? Third, evidence alone is never sufficient to make a clinical decision. Decision makers must always trade off the benefits with the risks, burden, and costs associated with alternative management strategies, and, in so doing, consider their patients' unique predicament, including their values and preferences.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072618433&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.02.005
DO - 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.02.005
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31193887
SN - 2542-4548
VL - 3
SP - 189
EP - 199
JO - Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes
JF - Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes
IS - 2
ER -