The injectable filler in rhinoplasty: not a complication-free alternative

P. Leupe, D. J. Menger*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The injectable filler in rhinoplasty: not a complication-free alternative.

    PROBLEM: Non-surgical or "filler" rhinoplasty seems an attractive tool to fine-tune the aesthetic results of surgery; its use as a primary technique is also increasingly popular. However, physicians performing these procedures should be aware that they are not complication-free.

    METHODOLOGY/RESULTS: In two case studies we now describe potential foreign body reactions, resulting in granulomas, to first generation silicone oil fillers, and second generation injectable hyaluronic acid fillers.

    CONCLUSIONS: Foreign body reactions are especially prevalent against permanent fillers, particularly silicone, and ideally these should be abandoned. Given that granulomas can also be provoked by temporary and semi-permanent fillers, we would advise restraint in their use, with appropriate vigilance to ensure the early recognition of complications. The increasing popularity of filler rhinoplasty will likely provoke a higher incidence of complications in the future. Intralesional steroid injections can be attempted as a treatment, although surgical resection of these "granulomas" may ultimately be required.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)137-142
    Number of pages6
    JournalB-ENT
    Volume12
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2016

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The injectable filler in rhinoplasty: not a complication-free alternative'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this