TY - JOUR
T1 - The impact of local staging of prostate cancer determined on MRI or DRE at time of radical prostatectomy on progression-free survival
T2 - A Will Rogers phenomenon
AU - Rakauskas, Arnas
AU - Peters, Max
AU - Ball, Daniel
AU - Kim, Na Hyun
AU - Ahmed, Hashim U
AU - Winkler, Mathias
AU - Shah, Taimur T
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s)
PY - 2023/2
Y1 - 2023/2
N2 - Introduction: We aimed to test whether the current practice of using mpMRI stage might lead to a Will Rogers phenomenon with a stage migration compared to DRE in men undergoing radical prostatectomy. Material and methods: A total of 572 consecutive patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at a single institution (2007–2017) were included. Clinical stage using digital rectal examination was determined on table by the operating surgeon; mpMRI and pathological stage were recorded after tumor board review. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as no rising PSA, no adjuvant/salvage treatment, and no metastases or mortality. PFS was compared between groups and a model incorporating mpMRI into the EAU risk groups was created. Results: Median age was 63 years (IQR 58.5–67) and median PSA was 8.9 ng/ml (IQR 6.5–13.2). Using DRE stage, 20% were NCCN low risk, 43% were intermediate, and 37% high. Median follow-up was 48 months (IQR 22–73). Estimated PFS at 1, 3, and 5 years was 75%, 59%, and 54%, respectively. When comparing PFS between DRE and mpMRI stages, patients deemed T1 (P < 0.01) or T3 (P = 0.03) by mpMRI showed better outcomes than patients staged T1 or T3 by DRE. On univariable analysis lower risk for failure was seen for MRI T1 disease (HR 0.10 95%, CI 0.01–0.73, P = 0.02) or MRI T3 (HR 0.70, CI 0.51–0.97, P = 0.03). On multivariable analysis, only MRI T1 remained a significant predictor (HR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01–0.59, P = 0.01). The subsequent, modified EAU risk model using both DRE and mpMRI performed significantly better than the DRE model. Conclusion: PFS based on mpMRI is not the same as DRE staging. Current risk groups which use DRE should be used with caution in whom local stage is based on mpMRI. Our modified EAU-risk categories can provide greater accuracy.
AB - Introduction: We aimed to test whether the current practice of using mpMRI stage might lead to a Will Rogers phenomenon with a stage migration compared to DRE in men undergoing radical prostatectomy. Material and methods: A total of 572 consecutive patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at a single institution (2007–2017) were included. Clinical stage using digital rectal examination was determined on table by the operating surgeon; mpMRI and pathological stage were recorded after tumor board review. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as no rising PSA, no adjuvant/salvage treatment, and no metastases or mortality. PFS was compared between groups and a model incorporating mpMRI into the EAU risk groups was created. Results: Median age was 63 years (IQR 58.5–67) and median PSA was 8.9 ng/ml (IQR 6.5–13.2). Using DRE stage, 20% were NCCN low risk, 43% were intermediate, and 37% high. Median follow-up was 48 months (IQR 22–73). Estimated PFS at 1, 3, and 5 years was 75%, 59%, and 54%, respectively. When comparing PFS between DRE and mpMRI stages, patients deemed T1 (P < 0.01) or T3 (P = 0.03) by mpMRI showed better outcomes than patients staged T1 or T3 by DRE. On univariable analysis lower risk for failure was seen for MRI T1 disease (HR 0.10 95%, CI 0.01–0.73, P = 0.02) or MRI T3 (HR 0.70, CI 0.51–0.97, P = 0.03). On multivariable analysis, only MRI T1 remained a significant predictor (HR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01–0.59, P = 0.01). The subsequent, modified EAU risk model using both DRE and mpMRI performed significantly better than the DRE model. Conclusion: PFS based on mpMRI is not the same as DRE staging. Current risk groups which use DRE should be used with caution in whom local stage is based on mpMRI. Our modified EAU-risk categories can provide greater accuracy.
KW - Magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Prostate cancer
KW - Radical prostatectomy
KW - Stage migration
KW - Will Rogers phenomenon
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144801690&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.10.023
DO - 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.10.023
M3 - Article
C2 - 36564258
SN - 1078-1439
VL - 41
SP - 106.e9-106.e16
JO - Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
JF - Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
IS - 2
ER -