The immunological phenotype of rituximab-sensitive chronic graft-versus-host disease: a phase II study

S. van Dorp, H. Resemann, L.C.J. te Boome, F.L. Pietersma, D. van Baarle, F.H.J. Gmelig Meyling, R.A. de Weger, E.J. Petersen, M.C. Minnema, H.M. Lokhorst, S.B. Ebeling, S.J.P. Beijn, E.F. Knol, M. van Dijk, E. Meijer, J.H.E. Kuball

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Chronic graft-versus-host disease is the major long-term complication after allogeneic stem cell transplantation with a suboptimal response rate to current treatments. Therefore, clinical efficacy and changes in lymphocyte subsets before and after rituximab treatment were evaluated in a prospective phase II study in patients with steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease. Overall response rate was 61%. Only responding patients were found to have increased B-cell numbers prior to treatment. B cells had a naive-antigen-presenting phenotype and were mainly CD5 negative or had a low CD5 expression. Normal B-cell homeostasis was reestablished in responding patients one year after ritxumab treatment and associated with a significant decline in skin-infiltrating CD8(+) T cells, suggesting that host B cells play a role in maintaining pathological CD8(+) T-cell responses. Imbalances in B-cell homeostasis could be used to identify patients a priori with a higher chance of response to rituximab treatment (Eudra-CT 2008-004125-42).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1380-1384
Number of pages5
JournalHaematologica
Volume96
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2011

Keywords

  • graft-versus-host-disease
  • B cell
  • rituximab
  • transplantation
  • STEM-CELL TRANSPLANTATION
  • CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
  • WORKING GROUP-REPORT
  • CLINICAL-TRIALS
  • B-CELLS
  • MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY
  • CHRONIC GVHD
  • AUTOIMMUNITY
  • CHIMERISM
  • CRITERIA

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The immunological phenotype of rituximab-sensitive chronic graft-versus-host disease: a phase II study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this