The Gastroscopy RAte of Cleanliness Evaluation (GRACE) Scale: an international reliability and validation study

Gianluca Esposito*, Emanuele Dilaghi, Cristina Costa-Santos, Irene Ligato, Bruno Annibale, Mário Dinis-Ribeiro, Miguel Areia, Vitor N. Arantes, Jacques Bergman, Raf Bisschops, Pieter J.F. de Jonge, Francesco Di Matteo, Alanna Ebigbo, Monika Ferlitsch, Vanja Giljaca, Cesare Hassan, Tomas Hucl, Roman Kuvaev, Philippe Leclercq, Tamara Matysiak-BudnikYuichi Mori, Alan Moss, Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles, Roos E. Pouw, Douglas K. Rex, Enrique Rodriguez de Santiago, Peter D. Siersema, Tony C. Tham, Konstantinos Triantafyllou, Andrei Voiosu, Bas Weusten, Gianluca Andrisani, Stefano Angeletti, Mousa Ayoub, Simon Bac, Kirsten Boonstra, Nienke Borren, Antonio Capogreco, Irene Chivato Martín Falquina, Jéssica Chaves, Nicolò Citterio, Arianna Dal Buono, Elisabetta Dell’Unto, Victor Dragan, Luís Elvas, Ksenia Filimendikova, Adrian Frick, John Guardiola, Natalie Halvorsen, Marc Le Rhun,

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background Mucosal visualization during upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy can be impaired by the presence of foam, bubbles, and mucus. Some UGI endoscopy visibility scales have been proposed but have not undergone multicenter validation. This study aimed to develop and validate the Gastroscopy RAte of Cleanliness Evaluation (GRACE) scale. Methods A multicenter, international, cross-sectional study was conducted. The GRACE scale is based on a score from 0 (worst) to 3 (excellent) for esophagus, stomach, and duodenum, for a total ranging from 0 to 9. In phase 1, four expert endoscopists evaluated 60 images twice, with a 2-week interval between rounds; in phase 2, the same 60 images were scored twice by one expert and one nonexpert endoscopist from 27 endoscopy departments worldwide. For reproducibility assessment and real-time validation, the scale was applied to consecutive patients undergoing gastroscopy at each center. Results On internal validation, interobserver agreement was 0.81 (95 %CI 0.73–0.87) and 0.80 (95 %CI 0.72–0.86), with reliability of 0.73 (95 %CI 0.63–0.82) and 0.72 (95 %CI 0.63–0.81), in the two rounds, respectively. On external validation, overall interobserver agreement was 0.85 (95 %CI 0.82–0.88) and reliability was 0.79 (95 %CI 0.73–0.84). In real-time evaluation, the overall proportion of correct classifications was 0.80 (95 %CI 0.77–0.82). Conclusions The GRACE scale showed good interobserver agreement, reliability, and validity. The widespread use of this scale could enhance quality and standardize the assessment of mucosal cleanliness during UGI endoscopy, pushing endoscopists to strive for excellent visibility and reducing the risk of missed lesions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)312-320
JournalEndoscopy
Volume57
Early online date8 Nov 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Gastroscopy RAte of Cleanliness Evaluation (GRACE) Scale: an international reliability and validation study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this