TY - JOUR
T1 - The Frequency of Primary Healthcare Contacts Preceding the Diagnosis of Lower-Extremity Arterial Disease
T2 - Do Women Consult General Practice Differently?
AU - Porras, Cindy P
AU - Teraa, Martin
AU - Bots, Michiel L
AU - de Boer, Annemarijn R
AU - Peters, Sanne A E
AU - van Doorn, Sander
AU - Vernooij, Robin W M
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Rebecca Stellato, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands, for her contribution to understanding the model and valuable comments. Thanks to the Rosanna Fund for Women, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands, for supporting Cindy Porras’ research internship.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2022/7/1
Y1 - 2022/7/1
N2 - Background. Women with lower-extremity arterial disease (LEAD) are often underdiagnosed, present themselves with more advanced disease at diagnosis, and fare worse than men. Objective. To investigate to what extent potential gender differences exist in the frequency and reasons for general practitioner (GP) consultation six months prior to the diagnosis of LEAD, as potential indicators of diagnostic delay. Methods. Individuals older than 18 years diagnosed with LEAD, sampled from the Julius General Practitioner’s Network (JGPN), were included and compared with a reference population, matched (1:2.6 ratio) in terms of age, sex, and general practice. We applied a zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) regression model. Results. The study population comprised 4044 patients with LEAD (43.5% women) and 10,486 subjects in the reference population (46.3% women). In the LEAD cohort, the number of GP contacts was 2.70 (95% CI: 2.42, 3.02) in women and 2.54 (2.29, 2.82) in men. In the reference cohort, 1.77 (95% CI: 1.62, 1.94) in women and 1.63 (CI: 1.50, 1.78) in men. In the LEAD cohort, 21.9% of GP contacts occurred one month prior to diagnosis. In both cohorts and both sexes, the most common cause of consultation during the last month before the index date was cardiovascular problems. Conclusions. Six months preceding the initial diagnosis of LEAD, patients visit the GP more often than a similar population without LEAD, regardless of gender. Reported gender differences in the severity of LEAD at diagnosis do not seem to be explained by a delay in presentation to the GP.
AB - Background. Women with lower-extremity arterial disease (LEAD) are often underdiagnosed, present themselves with more advanced disease at diagnosis, and fare worse than men. Objective. To investigate to what extent potential gender differences exist in the frequency and reasons for general practitioner (GP) consultation six months prior to the diagnosis of LEAD, as potential indicators of diagnostic delay. Methods. Individuals older than 18 years diagnosed with LEAD, sampled from the Julius General Practitioner’s Network (JGPN), were included and compared with a reference population, matched (1:2.6 ratio) in terms of age, sex, and general practice. We applied a zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) regression model. Results. The study population comprised 4044 patients with LEAD (43.5% women) and 10,486 subjects in the reference population (46.3% women). In the LEAD cohort, the number of GP contacts was 2.70 (95% CI: 2.42, 3.02) in women and 2.54 (2.29, 2.82) in men. In the reference cohort, 1.77 (95% CI: 1.62, 1.94) in women and 1.63 (CI: 1.50, 1.78) in men. In the LEAD cohort, 21.9% of GP contacts occurred one month prior to diagnosis. In both cohorts and both sexes, the most common cause of consultation during the last month before the index date was cardiovascular problems. Conclusions. Six months preceding the initial diagnosis of LEAD, patients visit the GP more often than a similar population without LEAD, regardless of gender. Reported gender differences in the severity of LEAD at diagnosis do not seem to be explained by a delay in presentation to the GP.
KW - gender differences
KW - general practitioner
KW - lower-extremity artery disease
KW - primary care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132702284&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/jcm11133666
DO - 10.3390/jcm11133666
M3 - Article
C2 - 35806951
SN - 2077-0383
VL - 11
SP - 1
EP - 9
JO - Journal of Clinical medicine
JF - Journal of Clinical medicine
IS - 13
M1 - 3666
ER -