TY - JOUR
T1 - The Feasibility of Implementing Mainstream Germline Genetic Testing in Routine Cancer Care—A Systematic Review
AU - Bokkers, Kyra
AU - Vlaming, Michiel
AU - Engelhardt, Ellen G.
AU - Zweemer, Ronald P.
AU - van Oort, Inge M.
AU - Kiemeney, Lambertus A.L.M.
AU - Bleiker, Eveline M.A.
AU - Ausems, Margreet G.E.M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: This work was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society (KWF, grant 12601).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2022/2/2
Y1 - 2022/2/2
N2 - Background: Non-genetic healthcare professionals can provide pre-test counseling and order germline genetic tests themselves, which is called mainstream genetic testing. In this systematic review, we determined whether mainstream genetic testing was feasible in daily practice while maintaining quality of genetic care. Methods: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsychINFO were searched for articles describing mainstream genetic testing initiatives in cancer care. Results: Seventeen articles, reporting on 15 studies, met the inclusion criteria. Non-genetic healthcare professionals concluded that mainstream genetic testing was possible within the timeframe of a routine consultation. In 14 studies, non-genetic healthcare professionals completed some form of training about genetics. When referral was coordinated by a genetics team, the majority of patients carrying a pathogenic variant were seen for post-test counseling by genetic healthcare professionals. The number of days between cancer diagnosis and test result disclosure was always lower in the mainstream genetic testing pathway than in the standard genetic testing pathway (e.g., pre-test counseling at genetics department). Conclusions: Mainstream genetic testing seems feasible in daily practice with no insurmountable barriers. A structured pathway with a training procedure is desirable, as well as a close collaboration between genetics and other clinical departments.
AB - Background: Non-genetic healthcare professionals can provide pre-test counseling and order germline genetic tests themselves, which is called mainstream genetic testing. In this systematic review, we determined whether mainstream genetic testing was feasible in daily practice while maintaining quality of genetic care. Methods: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsychINFO were searched for articles describing mainstream genetic testing initiatives in cancer care. Results: Seventeen articles, reporting on 15 studies, met the inclusion criteria. Non-genetic healthcare professionals concluded that mainstream genetic testing was possible within the timeframe of a routine consultation. In 14 studies, non-genetic healthcare professionals completed some form of training about genetics. When referral was coordinated by a genetics team, the majority of patients carrying a pathogenic variant were seen for post-test counseling by genetic healthcare professionals. The number of days between cancer diagnosis and test result disclosure was always lower in the mainstream genetic testing pathway than in the standard genetic testing pathway (e.g., pre-test counseling at genetics department). Conclusions: Mainstream genetic testing seems feasible in daily practice with no insurmountable barriers. A structured pathway with a training procedure is desirable, as well as a close collaboration between genetics and other clinical departments.
KW - Cancer
KW - Feasibility
KW - Genetic counseling
KW - Mainstream genetic testing
KW - Quality of care
KW - Systematic review
KW - feasibility
KW - genetic counseling
KW - mainstream genetic testing
KW - cancer
KW - systematic review
KW - quality of care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124937387&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/cancers14041059
DO - 10.3390/cancers14041059
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35205807
AN - SCOPUS:85124937387
SN - 2072-6694
VL - 14
SP - 1
EP - 15
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
IS - 4
M1 - 1059
ER -