TY - JOUR
T1 - The Efficacy of Coil Embolization to Obtain Intrahepatic Redistribution in Radioembolization
T2 - Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses
AU - Alsultan, Ahmed A
AU - van Roekel, Caren
AU - Barentsz, Maarten W
AU - Braat, Arthur J A T
AU - van Doormaal, Pieter Jan
AU - Lam, Marnix G E H
AU - Smits, Maarten L J
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Remco Bastiaanet, Chris van Kesteren, and Mike Scholten for their assistance.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, The Author(s).
PY - 2020/3
Y1 - 2020/3
N2 - PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of coil embolization to obtain intrahepatic redistribution in patients undergoing radioembolization.MATERIALS AND METHOD: All patients treated with radioembolization at our institute were retrospectively analyzed, and all cases in which a tumor-feeding vessel was coil-embolized were selected. Two nuclear medicine physicians visually assessed the effect of redistribution. Furthermore, the redistribution of microspheres was measured by quantifying the activity distributed to the coil-embolized (dependent) segment relative to the other (non-dependent) segments and to the tumor(s) in that segment. Quantitative analysis was performed on post-treatment 90Y-PET and 166Ho-SPECT using Simplicit90Y software. Lesion response was measured according to RECIST 1.1 criteria at 3 months post-treatment.RESULTS: Out of 37 cases, 32 were suitable for quantitative analysis and 37 for qualitative analysis. In the qualitative analysis, redistribution was deemed successful in 69% of cases. The quantitative analysis showed that the median ratio of the activity to the dependent embolized segments and the non-dependent segments was 0.88 (range 0.26-2.05) and 0.80 (range 0.19-1.62) for tumors in dependent segments compared with tumors in non-dependent segments. Using a cutoff ratio of 0.7 (30% lower activity concentration in comparison with the rest of the liver), 57% of cases were successful. At 3 months post-treatment, 6% of dependent tumors had partial response, 20% progressive disease, and 74% stable disease. In non-dependent tumors, this was, respectively, 16%, 20%, and 64%.CONCLUSION: Coil embolization of hepatic arteries to induce redistribution of microspheres has a limited success rate. Qualitative assessment tends to overrate redistribution.
AB - PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of coil embolization to obtain intrahepatic redistribution in patients undergoing radioembolization.MATERIALS AND METHOD: All patients treated with radioembolization at our institute were retrospectively analyzed, and all cases in which a tumor-feeding vessel was coil-embolized were selected. Two nuclear medicine physicians visually assessed the effect of redistribution. Furthermore, the redistribution of microspheres was measured by quantifying the activity distributed to the coil-embolized (dependent) segment relative to the other (non-dependent) segments and to the tumor(s) in that segment. Quantitative analysis was performed on post-treatment 90Y-PET and 166Ho-SPECT using Simplicit90Y software. Lesion response was measured according to RECIST 1.1 criteria at 3 months post-treatment.RESULTS: Out of 37 cases, 32 were suitable for quantitative analysis and 37 for qualitative analysis. In the qualitative analysis, redistribution was deemed successful in 69% of cases. The quantitative analysis showed that the median ratio of the activity to the dependent embolized segments and the non-dependent segments was 0.88 (range 0.26-2.05) and 0.80 (range 0.19-1.62) for tumors in dependent segments compared with tumors in non-dependent segments. Using a cutoff ratio of 0.7 (30% lower activity concentration in comparison with the rest of the liver), 57% of cases were successful. At 3 months post-treatment, 6% of dependent tumors had partial response, 20% progressive disease, and 74% stable disease. In non-dependent tumors, this was, respectively, 16%, 20%, and 64%.CONCLUSION: Coil embolization of hepatic arteries to induce redistribution of microspheres has a limited success rate. Qualitative assessment tends to overrate redistribution.
KW - Intrahepatic redistribution
KW - Quantitative analysis
KW - Transarterial radioembolization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074341885&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00270-019-02351-1
DO - 10.1007/s00270-019-02351-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 31650243
SN - 0174-1551
VL - 43
SP - 391
EP - 401
JO - Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology
JF - Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology
IS - 3
ER -