TY - JOUR
T1 - The Effect of Teaching Search Strategies on Perceptual Performance
AU - van der Gijp, Anouk
AU - Vincken, Koen L
AU - Boscardin, Christy K.
AU - Webb, Emily M
AU - Ten Cate, Olle Th J
AU - Naeger, David M
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Association of University Radiologists
PY - 2017/6
Y1 - 2017/6
N2 - Rationale and Objectives Radiology expertise is dependent on the use of efficient search strategies. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of teaching search strategies on trainee's accuracy in detecting lung nodules at computed tomography. Materials and Methods Two search strategies, “scanning” and “drilling,” were tested with a randomized crossover design. Nineteen junior radiology residents were randomized into two groups. Both groups first completed a baseline lung nodule detection test allowing a free search strategy, followed by a test after scanning instruction and drilling instruction or vice versa. True positive (TP) and false positive (FP) scores and scroll behavior were registered. A mixed-design analysis of variance was applied to compare the three search conditions. Results Search strategy instruction had a significant effect on scroll behavior, F(1.3) = 54.2, P < 0.001; TP score, F(2) = 16.1, P < 0.001; and FP score, F(1.3) = 15.3, P < 0.001. Scanning instruction resulted in significantly lower TP scores than drilling instruction (M = 10.7, SD = 5.0 versus M = 16.3, SD = 5.3), t(18) = 4.78, P < 0.001; or free search (M = 15.3, SD = 4.6), t(18) = 4.44, P < 0.001. TP scores for drilling did not significantly differ from free search. FP scores for drilling (M = 7.3, SD = 5.6) were significantly lower than for free search (M = 12.5, SD = 7.8), t(18) = 4.86, P < 0.001. Conclusions Teaching a drilling strategy is preferable to teaching a scanning strategy for finding lung nodules.
AB - Rationale and Objectives Radiology expertise is dependent on the use of efficient search strategies. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of teaching search strategies on trainee's accuracy in detecting lung nodules at computed tomography. Materials and Methods Two search strategies, “scanning” and “drilling,” were tested with a randomized crossover design. Nineteen junior radiology residents were randomized into two groups. Both groups first completed a baseline lung nodule detection test allowing a free search strategy, followed by a test after scanning instruction and drilling instruction or vice versa. True positive (TP) and false positive (FP) scores and scroll behavior were registered. A mixed-design analysis of variance was applied to compare the three search conditions. Results Search strategy instruction had a significant effect on scroll behavior, F(1.3) = 54.2, P < 0.001; TP score, F(2) = 16.1, P < 0.001; and FP score, F(1.3) = 15.3, P < 0.001. Scanning instruction resulted in significantly lower TP scores than drilling instruction (M = 10.7, SD = 5.0 versus M = 16.3, SD = 5.3), t(18) = 4.78, P < 0.001; or free search (M = 15.3, SD = 4.6), t(18) = 4.44, P < 0.001. TP scores for drilling did not significantly differ from free search. FP scores for drilling (M = 7.3, SD = 5.6) were significantly lower than for free search (M = 12.5, SD = 7.8), t(18) = 4.86, P < 0.001. Conclusions Teaching a drilling strategy is preferable to teaching a scanning strategy for finding lung nodules.
KW - Radiology education
KW - medical image perception
KW - pulmonary nodules
KW - search strategies
U2 - 10.1016/j.acra.2017.01.007
DO - 10.1016/j.acra.2017.01.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 28242103
SN - 1076-6332
VL - 24
SP - 762
EP - 767
JO - Academic Radiology
JF - Academic Radiology
IS - 6
ER -