TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of physician training and patient education on the discussion of care decisions at the internal medicine outpatient clinic
AU - Briedé, Saskia
AU - de Winter, Maria A.
AU - van Charldorp, Tessa C.
AU - Kaasjager, Karin A.H.
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank all physicians and patients that participated in this study. Furthermore, we would like to thank B. Silvius, I.P Klaassen and C.A.M Joosten (research nurses) and C. van Ginkel (physician) for assistance in recruiting participants and obtaining informed consents.
Funding Information:
This work was funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), grant number 516000504 (80–83900-98–753). The funding foundation had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, preparation of the article, or decision to publish.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Background: Care decision discussions are intended to align treatment with the patient’s wishes, goals and values. To overcome the numerous barriers to such discussions, physicians as well as patients need tailored support. We evaluate the effect of a physicians’ training and a conversation aid for patients about care decisions on patient and physician outcomes. Methods: At the internal medicine outpatient clinic of the University Medical Centre Utrecht, a 1:1 randomized, parallel-group study (patient conversation aid) was combined with a pre-post intervention (physicians’ training) design. Primary outcome was patient satisfaction, secondary outcomes were patient-doctor relationship, shared-decision-making, doctor preparedness and patient appreciation of the conversation aid. Results: Between October 2018 and February 2020 11 physicians (36% residents, 73% female) and 185 patients (median age 58 years (interquartile range (IQR) 50–68), 60% male) participated. Only 28% of the patients reported a care decision discussion during the consultation. We found no effect of the interventions on patient satisfaction (effect sizes -0.14 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.56–0.27) for conversation aid; 0.04 (95% CI -0.40–0.48) for physician’s training), nor on the patient-doctor relationship or shared-decision-making. However, physicians felt more prepared to discuss care decisions after training (median 3 (IQR 1–4) vs 1 (IQR 0–3), p = 0.015). Patients assessed the conversation aid informative and gave an overall mark of median 7 (IQR 7–8). Conclusions: First steps towards fruitful discussions about care decisions were made: patients considered the conversation aid informative and physicians felt better prepared to discuss care decisions after training. The low number of care decision conversations patients reported shows exactly how important it is to focus on interventions that facilitate these discussions, for both the patient and physician. Further work needs to be done to establish the best way to empower patients and physicians. Trial registration: Dutch trial register, trial 6998 (NTR 7188), registered 04/05/2018, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6998.
AB - Background: Care decision discussions are intended to align treatment with the patient’s wishes, goals and values. To overcome the numerous barriers to such discussions, physicians as well as patients need tailored support. We evaluate the effect of a physicians’ training and a conversation aid for patients about care decisions on patient and physician outcomes. Methods: At the internal medicine outpatient clinic of the University Medical Centre Utrecht, a 1:1 randomized, parallel-group study (patient conversation aid) was combined with a pre-post intervention (physicians’ training) design. Primary outcome was patient satisfaction, secondary outcomes were patient-doctor relationship, shared-decision-making, doctor preparedness and patient appreciation of the conversation aid. Results: Between October 2018 and February 2020 11 physicians (36% residents, 73% female) and 185 patients (median age 58 years (interquartile range (IQR) 50–68), 60% male) participated. Only 28% of the patients reported a care decision discussion during the consultation. We found no effect of the interventions on patient satisfaction (effect sizes -0.14 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.56–0.27) for conversation aid; 0.04 (95% CI -0.40–0.48) for physician’s training), nor on the patient-doctor relationship or shared-decision-making. However, physicians felt more prepared to discuss care decisions after training (median 3 (IQR 1–4) vs 1 (IQR 0–3), p = 0.015). Patients assessed the conversation aid informative and gave an overall mark of median 7 (IQR 7–8). Conclusions: First steps towards fruitful discussions about care decisions were made: patients considered the conversation aid informative and physicians felt better prepared to discuss care decisions after training. The low number of care decision conversations patients reported shows exactly how important it is to focus on interventions that facilitate these discussions, for both the patient and physician. Further work needs to be done to establish the best way to empower patients and physicians. Trial registration: Dutch trial register, trial 6998 (NTR 7188), registered 04/05/2018, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6998.
KW - Care decisions
KW - Communication training
KW - Outpatient clinic
KW - Patient education
KW - Provider-patient communication
KW - Treatment limitations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144487699&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12913-022-08901-7
DO - 10.1186/s12913-022-08901-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 36550522
AN - SCOPUS:85144487699
SN - 1472-6963
VL - 22
JO - BMC Health Services Research
JF - BMC Health Services Research
IS - 1
M1 - 1569
ER -